[v2,3/6] libatasmart: new package.

Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@open-nandra.com>
---
 package/Config.in                  |    2 ++
 package/libatasmart/Config.in      |   11 +++++++++++
 package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk |   17 +++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 package/libatasmart/Config.in
 create mode 100644 package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk

Dear Marek Belisko,

On Mon,  7 Jan 2013 21:43:16 +0100, Marek Belisko wrote:

> diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in
> index c889d8a..53bb5be 100644
> --- a/package/Config.in
> +++ b/package/Config.in
> @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ source "package/iostat/Config.in"
>  source "package/irda-utils/Config.in"
>  source "package/kbd/Config.in"
>  source "package/lcdproc/Config.in"
> +source "package/libatasmart/Config.in"
> +source "package/linux-firmware/Config.in"

Seems like a mismerge. You shouldn't be adding a
linux-firmware/Config.in include.

> +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBATASMART
> +	bool "libatasmart"
> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV
> +	help
> +	  Reading and Parsing Library.

This description sounds odd. Reading and Parsing Library for what?

> +	  As the name suggests libatasmart only does ATA S.M.A.R.T.
> +
> +	  http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/libatasmart.html
> +
> +comment "libatasmart requires udev to be enabled"
> +	depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV

Could you detail a little why udev is a dependency. Is libudev a
dependency? Something else? We need to understand if it's a build
dependency, a runtime dependency, the requirement for the system to
actually use and run udev, etc.

> diff --git a/package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk b/package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..3f8e36b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +#############################################################
> +#
> +# libatasmart
> +#
> +#############################################################
> +LIBATASMART_VERSION = 0.19
> +LIBATASMART_SOURCE = libatasmart-$(LIBATASMART_VERSION).tar.xz
> +LIBATASMART_SITE    = http://0pointer.de/public
> +LIBATASMART_LICENCE = LGPL

LICENSE. Be more specific that LGPL.

> +LIBATASMART_LICELCE_FILE = LGPL

LICENSE_FILES

> +LIBATASMART_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
> +
> +LIBATASMART_AUTORECONF = YES

Please add a comment here that explains why AUTORECONF = YES is needed.

> +
> +LIBATASMART_DEPENDENCIES = udev
> +
> +$(eval $(autotools-package))

Thomas

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Dear Marek Belisko,
>
> On Mon,  7 Jan 2013 21:43:16 +0100, Marek Belisko wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in
>> index c889d8a..53bb5be 100644
>> --- a/package/Config.in
>> +++ b/package/Config.in
>> @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ source "package/iostat/Config.in"
>>  source "package/irda-utils/Config.in"
>>  source "package/kbd/Config.in"
>>  source "package/lcdproc/Config.in"
>> +source "package/libatasmart/Config.in"
>> +source "package/linux-firmware/Config.in"
>
> Seems like a mismerge. You shouldn't be adding a
> linux-firmware/Config.in include.
Right. I did rebase to actual master and make wrong config resolve.
Will fix that.
>
>> +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBATASMART
>> +     bool "libatasmart"
>> +     depends on BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV
>> +     help
>> +       Reading and Parsing Library.
>
> This description sounds odd. Reading and Parsing Library for what?
>
>> +       As the name suggests libatasmart only does ATA S.M.A.R.T.
>> +
>> +       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/libatasmart.html
>> +
>> +comment "libatasmart requires udev to be enabled"
>> +     depends on !BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV
>
> Could you detail a little why udev is a dependency. Is libudev a
> dependency? Something else? We need to understand if it's a build
> dependency, a runtime dependency, the requirement for the system to
> actually use and run udev, etc.
libudev is dependency for libatasmart.
>
>> diff --git a/package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk b/package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..3f8e36b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/package/libatasmart/libatasmart.mk
>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>> +#############################################################
>> +#
>> +# libatasmart
>> +#
>> +#############################################################
>> +LIBATASMART_VERSION = 0.19
>> +LIBATASMART_SOURCE = libatasmart-$(LIBATASMART_VERSION).tar.xz
>> +LIBATASMART_SITE    = http://0pointer.de/public
>> +LIBATASMART_LICENCE = LGPL
>
> LICENSE. Be more specific that LGPL.
>
>> +LIBATASMART_LICELCE_FILE = LGPL
>
> LICENSE_FILES
>
>> +LIBATASMART_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
>> +
>> +LIBATASMART_AUTORECONF = YES
>
> Please add a comment here that explains why AUTORECONF = YES is needed.
>
>> +
>> +LIBATASMART_DEPENDENCIES = udev
>> +
>> +$(eval $(autotools-package))
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
> Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
> development, consulting, training and support.
> http://free-electrons.com

Thanks,

mbe

Dear Belisko Marek,

On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:52:08 +0100, Belisko Marek wrote:

> > Could you detail a little why udev is a dependency. Is libudev a
> > dependency? Something else? We need to understand if it's a build
> > dependency, a runtime dependency, the requirement for the system to
> > actually use and run udev, etc.
> libudev is dependency for libatasmart.

Ok, then maybe put a comment on top of the "depends on
BR2_PACKAGE_UDEV".

Thanks,

Thomas