mbox series

[000/241] Finish migration to Kconfig or CFG namespace

Message ID 20221120133352.3055600-1-trini@konsulko.com
Headers show
Series Finish migration to Kconfig or CFG namespace | expand

Message

Tom Rini Nov. 20, 2022, 1:29 p.m. UTC 
Hey all,

The intention of this series isn't to apply it just yet. This was a very
quick scripted migration and so there's cases where we do more than one
symbol, or we can see there's define but unused symbols. But it also
shows that with the last few series I've posted, we're nearly done. With
this series applied, everything builds still, and the resulting binaries
seem to be the same (I'm doing a build where I keep before/after so I
can check checksums now).

Comments

Simon Glass Nov. 21, 2022, 10:51 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Tom,

On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 06:34, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> The intention of this series isn't to apply it just yet. This was a very
> quick scripted migration and so there's cases where we do more than one
> symbol, or we can see there's define but unused symbols. But it also
> shows that with the last few series I've posted, we're nearly done. With
> this series applied, everything builds still, and the resulting binaries
> seem to be the same (I'm doing a build where I keep before/after so I
> can check checksums now).

It's great to see this? When will it be applied? Perhaps when -next opens up?

Regards,
Simon
Tom Rini Nov. 21, 2022, 10:56 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:51:06PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2022 at 06:34, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > The intention of this series isn't to apply it just yet. This was a very
> > quick scripted migration and so there's cases where we do more than one
> > symbol, or we can see there's define but unused symbols. But it also
> > shows that with the last few series I've posted, we're nearly done. With
> > this series applied, everything builds still, and the resulting binaries
> > seem to be the same (I'm doing a build where I keep before/after so I
> > can check checksums now).
> 
> It's great to see this? When will it be applied? Perhaps when -next opens up?

Everything leading up to this will go in to -next. I have a handful of
notes already on symbols that should get migrated to Kconfig or removed
outright after skimming this series, and making that be real is the next
step. Then re-running the scripted everything-else series and applying.