| Message ID | 1384378130-8599-7-git-send-email-spenser@gillilanding.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Dear Spenser Gilliland, On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:28:49 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser@gillilanding.com> > --- > toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > index 1529004..57bbc3d 100644 > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ choice > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC > bool "uClibc" > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC > + depends on !BR2_microblaze Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also, since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C library other than uClibc could they use? That being said, I don't *require* you to add the support for uClibc. Having glibc/eglibc support is already good. We can add uClibc support later on. Best regards, Thomas
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 22:58 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Spenser Gilliland, > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:28:49 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser@gillilanding.com> > > --- > > toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > > index 1529004..57bbc3d 100644 > > --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > > +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ choice > > config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC > > bool "uClibc" > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC > > + depends on !BR2_microblaze > > Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also, > since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C > library other than uClibc could they use? In the distant past there may have been a version of uclibc that worked with microblaze. However from my limited testing, the current toolchain does not work with uclibc. > That being said, I don't *require* you to add the support for uClibc. > Having glibc/eglibc support is already good. We can add uClibc support > later on. Sounds great. Thanks, Spenser
Dear Spenser Gilliland, On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:35:33 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC > > > + depends on !BR2_microblaze > > > > Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also, > > since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C > > library other than uClibc could they use? > > In the distant past there may have been a version of uclibc that worked > with microblaze. However from my limited testing, the current toolchain > does not work with uclibc. Ok. But then which C library are Microblaze non-MMU users using? Thanks! Thomas
On Nov 13, 2013 5:20 PM, "Thomas Petazzoni" < thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > Dear Spenser Gilliland, > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:35:33 -0600, Spenser Gilliland wrote: > > > > > select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC > > > > + depends on !BR2_microblaze > > > > > > Hum, I see a libc/sysdeps/linux/microblaze in my uClibc tree. And also, > > > since there are some no-MMU variant of Microblaze processors, which C > > > library other than uClibc could they use? > > > > In the distant past there may have been a version of uclibc that worked > > with microblaze. However from my limited testing, the current toolchain > > does not work with uclibc. > > Ok. But then which C library are Microblaze non-MMU users using? Likely a version from petalinux. This needs to be investigated further to see if uclibc support is possible with newer toolchains and any patches from petalinux. > Thanks! > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com
diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in index 1529004..57bbc3d 100644 --- a/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ choice config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_UCLIBC bool "uClibc" select BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC + depends on !BR2_microblaze help This option selects uClibc as the C library for the cross-compilation toolchain.
Signed-off-by: Spenser Gilliland <spenser@gillilanding.com> --- toolchain/toolchain-buildroot/Config.in | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)