Message ID | 20221117001511.1753592-1-gadiyar@ti.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | add support for TI's AM64x boards | expand |
On November 16, 2022 thus sayeth Anand Gadiyar: > This series introduces support for TI's AM64x SK boards. > > We would like to add support for the AM62x SK as well, but are > currently blocked by availability of some firmware. That's still > on the list, as is the SK-TDA4VM. We should also be able to > enable the beagleboard-ai64 alongside that at the same time. > > > This series was previously sent out by Xuanhao in August and > was reviewed by Giulio Benetti up to v5 (Thanks!). > > This series addresses further review comments for v5 from Romain > Naour. Thanks for the review Romain! > > Andrew Davis acked the previous series, except for one new change > that I've addressed in this version. > > I addressed all of Romain's comments except one - I couldn't get > the sha256sum for the k3-image-gen package to be updated in the > source repository, so for now it's still manually computed. I'll > see what I can do about getting the repository owners to generate > these automatically at release time. > > Changes in v6: > - rebased to latest next branch and retested > - updated u-boot and kernel to latest released versions as of today > From Andrew's comments: > - added a new SOC_TYPE option for k3-image-gen, as requested by Andrew > Davis in a review comment. > From Romain's comments: > - use "if" instead of "depends on" for sub-options > - move TI K3 R5 Loader defconfig selection to Kconfig > - use $(HOST_DIR) instead of $(HOST_ARM_GNU_TOOLCHAIN_INSTALL_DIR) > - Retain Xuanhao's gmail ID in the MAINTAINERs file, but drop his TI > email from CC list as it will be inactive till he rejoins TI > - Add a plain-text license file into the k3-image-gen repository and use > it instead of the HTML manifest file. Confirmed that this is still > BSD-3-Clause license. > - Add comments in the ti-k3-image-gen.mk file for a couple of options > Sorry for the noise everyone.. I wasn't subscribed to the lists and it rejected my mail :( Tested-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com> The patches still look great to me :) ~Bryan