Message ID | 1387373261-26398-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes: > Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony, > > This is my current patch queue for s390. Please pull. > > Alex > > > The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43: > Laszlo Ersek (1): > qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream Are you requesting the pull of the tag or the branch? You previously submitted signed tags. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Cornelia Huck (1): > s390x/kvm: Fix diagnose handling. > > Thomas Huth (7): > s390x/kvm: Removed duplicated SIGP defines > s390x/kvm: Removed s390_store_status stub > s390x/kvm: Fix coding style in handle_sigp() > s390x/kvm: Implemented SIGP START > s390x/kvm: Simplified the calculation of the SIGP order code > s390x/kvm: Fixed condition code for unknown SIGP orders > s390x/ioinst: CHSC has to set a condition code > > target-s390x/cpu.h | 3 + > target-s390x/ioinst.c | 1 + > target-s390x/kvm.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
On 19.12.2013, at 20:57, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes: > >> Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony, >> >> This is my current patch queue for s390. Please pull. >> >> Alex >> >> >> The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43: >> Laszlo Ersek (1): >> qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream > > Are you requesting the pull of the tag or the branch? > > You previously submitted signed tags. The same tree is available as a tag called "signed-s390-for-upstream". I'm not sure why git request-pull didn't use that one to be honest. The way I generate this message is: git request-pull $UPSTREAM $GIT_TREE signed-$EXT_BRANCH >> $DEST/0000-cover-letter.patch so I even tell it the signed tag. Alex
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:02:24AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 19.12.2013, at 20:57, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote: > > > Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes: > > > >> Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony, > >> > >> This is my current patch queue for s390. Please pull. > >> > >> Alex > >> > >> > >> The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43: > >> Laszlo Ersek (1): > >> qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream > > > > Are you requesting the pull of the tag or the branch? > > > > You previously submitted signed tags. > > The same tree is available as a tag called "signed-s390-for-upstream". I'm not sure why git request-pull didn't use that one to be honest. The way I generate this message is: > > git request-pull $UPSTREAM $GIT_TREE signed-$EXT_BRANCH >> $DEST/0000-cover-letter.patch > > so I even tell it the signed tag. Thanks, I have pulled the signed tag.