mbox

[PULL,0/8] s390 patch queue 2013-12-18

Message ID 1387373261-26398-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream

Message

Alexander Graf Dec. 18, 2013, 1:27 p.m. UTC
Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony,

This is my current patch queue for s390.  Please pull.

Alex


The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43:
  Laszlo Ersek (1):
        qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream

Cornelia Huck (1):
      s390x/kvm: Fix diagnose handling.

Thomas Huth (7):
      s390x/kvm: Removed duplicated SIGP defines
      s390x/kvm: Removed s390_store_status stub
      s390x/kvm: Fix coding style in handle_sigp()
      s390x/kvm: Implemented SIGP START
      s390x/kvm: Simplified the calculation of the SIGP order code
      s390x/kvm: Fixed condition code for unknown SIGP orders
      s390x/ioinst: CHSC has to set a condition code

 target-s390x/cpu.h    |    3 +
 target-s390x/ioinst.c |    1 +
 target-s390x/kvm.c    |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

Comments

Anthony Liguori Dec. 19, 2013, 7:57 p.m. UTC | #1
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:

> Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony,
>
> This is my current patch queue for s390.  Please pull.
>
> Alex
>
>
> The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43:
>   Laszlo Ersek (1):
>         qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream

Are you requesting the pull of the tag or the branch?

You previously submitted signed tags.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Cornelia Huck (1):
>       s390x/kvm: Fix diagnose handling.
>
> Thomas Huth (7):
>       s390x/kvm: Removed duplicated SIGP defines
>       s390x/kvm: Removed s390_store_status stub
>       s390x/kvm: Fix coding style in handle_sigp()
>       s390x/kvm: Implemented SIGP START
>       s390x/kvm: Simplified the calculation of the SIGP order code
>       s390x/kvm: Fixed condition code for unknown SIGP orders
>       s390x/ioinst: CHSC has to set a condition code
>
>  target-s390x/cpu.h    |    3 +
>  target-s390x/ioinst.c |    1 +
>  target-s390x/kvm.c    |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Alexander Graf Dec. 19, 2013, 11:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On 19.12.2013, at 20:57, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:

> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
> 
>> Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony,
>> 
>> This is my current patch queue for s390.  Please pull.
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> 
>> The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43:
>>  Laszlo Ersek (1):
>>        qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value
>> 
>> are available in the git repository at:
>> 
>>  git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream
> 
> Are you requesting the pull of the tag or the branch?
> 
> You previously submitted signed tags.

The same tree is available as a tag called "signed-s390-for-upstream". I'm not sure why git request-pull didn't use that one to be honest. The way I generate this message is:

  git request-pull $UPSTREAM $GIT_TREE signed-$EXT_BRANCH >> $DEST/0000-cover-letter.patch

so I even tell it the signed tag.


Alex
Aurelien Jarno Dec. 21, 2013, 4:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:02:24AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 19.12.2013, at 20:57, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> 
> > Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
> > 
> >> Hi Blue / Aurelien / Anthony,
> >> 
> >> This is my current patch queue for s390.  Please pull.
> >> 
> >> Alex
> >> 
> >> 
> >> The following changes since commit f46e720a82ccdf1a521cf459448f3f96ed895d43:
> >>  Laszlo Ersek (1):
> >>        qemu_opts_parse(): always check return value
> >> 
> >> are available in the git repository at:
> >> 
> >>  git://github.com/agraf/qemu.git s390-for-upstream
> > 
> > Are you requesting the pull of the tag or the branch?
> > 
> > You previously submitted signed tags.
> 
> The same tree is available as a tag called "signed-s390-for-upstream". I'm not sure why git request-pull didn't use that one to be honest. The way I generate this message is:
> 
>   git request-pull $UPSTREAM $GIT_TREE signed-$EXT_BRANCH >> $DEST/0000-cover-letter.patch
> 
> so I even tell it the signed tag.

Thanks, I have pulled the signed tag.