Message ID | 20201220151203.2206747-5-romain.naour@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Series | [PATCHv6,1/5] package/llvm: add BPF backend | expand |
On 12/20/20 16:12, Romain Naour wrote: > The luajit dependency was explicitely disabled when bcc has > been added to Buildroot. > Even if the python binding is probably more used, enable > luajit binding if luajit package is enabled in the defconfig. > > Fix the luajit command line used to build bcc.o, otherwise > bcc.o is build for the host. > > Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> > Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> > --- This compiles fine for me. And the patch looks good to me too. But when I tried to test it by following the example from the website $ sudo src/lua/bcc-probe examples/lua/task_switch.lua I noticed there's no bcc-probe in the target. When I copied it manually and tried to run the above command I ended up with the below error. # /root/bcc-probe examples/lua/task_switch.lua luajit: /root/bcc-probe:20: module 'bcc.run' not found: no field package.preload['bcc.run'] no file '/root//bcc/run.lua' no file './bcc/run.lua' no file '/usr/share/luajit-2.1.2/bcc/run.lua' no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run.lua' no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run/init.lua' no file '/usr/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run.lua' no file '/usr/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run/init.lua' no file './bcc/run.so' no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/bcc/run.so' no file '/usr/lib/lua/5.1/bcc/run.so' no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so' no file './bcc.so' no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/bcc.so' no file '/usr/lib/lua/5.1/bcc.so' no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so' stack traceback: [C]: in function 'require' /root/bcc-probe:20: in main chunk [C]: at 0x00402414 I admit I enabled luajit after initially building bcc without it. Although I deleted output/build/bcc* to ensure it gets rebuilt against the new dependency. I'll try again with a full clean build to see if this fixes it. Thanks -- Qais Yousef
On 12/21/20 14:30, Qais Yousef wrote: > On 12/20/20 16:12, Romain Naour wrote: > > The luajit dependency was explicitely disabled when bcc has > > been added to Buildroot. > > Even if the python binding is probably more used, enable > > luajit binding if luajit package is enabled in the defconfig. > > > > Fix the luajit command line used to build bcc.o, otherwise > > bcc.o is build for the host. > > > > Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> > > Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> > > --- > > This compiles fine for me. And the patch looks good to me too. But when I tried > to test it by following the example from the website > > $ sudo src/lua/bcc-probe examples/lua/task_switch.lua > > I noticed there's no bcc-probe in the target. When I copied it manually and > tried to run the above command I ended up with the below error. > > # /root/bcc-probe examples/lua/task_switch.lua > luajit: /root/bcc-probe:20: module 'bcc.run' not found: > no field package.preload['bcc.run'] > no file '/root//bcc/run.lua' > no file './bcc/run.lua' > no file '/usr/share/luajit-2.1.2/bcc/run.lua' > no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run.lua' > no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run/init.lua' > no file '/usr/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run.lua' > no file '/usr/share/lua/5.1/bcc/run/init.lua' > no file './bcc/run.so' > no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/bcc/run.so' > no file '/usr/lib/lua/5.1/bcc/run.so' > no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so' > no file './bcc.so' > no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/bcc.so' > no file '/usr/lib/lua/5.1/bcc.so' > no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so' > stack traceback: > [C]: in function 'require' > /root/bcc-probe:20: in main chunk > [C]: at 0x00402414 > > I admit I enabled luajit after initially building bcc without it. Although > I deleted output/build/bcc* to ensure it gets rebuilt against the new > dependency. > > I'll try again with a full clean build to see if this fixes it. Same thing with a new clean build. I just enabled BR2_PACKAGE_LUAJIT. Is there a dependency on lua 5.1 too? Thanks -- Qais Yousef
On 20/12/2020 16:12, Romain Naour wrote: > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH "-a") > ++ # https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/blob/f0e865dd4861520258299d0f2a56491bd9d602e1/src/jit/bcsave.lua#L30 > ++ # https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/blob/f0e865dd4861520258299d0f2a56491bd9d602e1/src/jit/bcsave.lua#L65 > ++ if (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR STREQUAL "aarch64") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "arm64") This is a very weird way of adding the -a. Why not just: SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH "arm64") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "aarch64_be") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "arm64be") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "arm") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "arm") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "^(i.86)$") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "x86") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "mips") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "mips") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "mipsel") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "mipsel") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "powerpc") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "ppc") > ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "x86_64") > ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "x64") > ++ else() > ++ MESSAGE(FATAL_ERROR "${CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR} is not supported by LuaJIT") > ++ endif() > ++ endif() > ++ > + ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND( > + OUTPUT bcc.o > +- COMMAND ${LUAJIT} -bg bcc.lua bcc.o > ++ COMMAND ${LUAJIT} -bg bcc.lua ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} bcc.o and here COMMAND ${LUAJIT} -bg bcc.lua -a ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} bcc.o Also, has this patch been sent upstream? Regards, Arnout > + DEPENDS bcc.lua > + ) > +
diff --git a/package/bcc/0003-fix-aarch64-cross-compile.patch b/package/bcc/0003-fix-aarch64-cross-compile.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6b4279754c --- /dev/null +++ b/package/bcc/0003-fix-aarch64-cross-compile.patch @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ +From 5a5b0f04484e00c88e7be902101367d6d591fb96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Jugurtha BELKALEM <jugurtha.belkalem@smile.fr> +Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 11:06:23 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH] cmake/luajit: Provide the target architecture to luaJIT while + cross-compiling + +Unlike CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR which identifies aarch64 +as a valid architecture, luajit does not recognize it. +luajit defines aarch64 as arm64. + +LuaJIT doesn't use usual arch naming, so we have to convert +between CMake and Luajit for each architectures while +cross-compiling. + +Signed-off-by: Jugurtha BELKALEM <jugurtha.belkalem@smile.fr> +Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@smile.fr> +--- +v2: Do the same for other architecture supported by LuaJIT. +https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/2480 +--- + src/lua/CMakeLists.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- + 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) + +diff --git a/src/lua/CMakeLists.txt b/src/lua/CMakeLists.txt +index 7541d48df..226e1b1d2 100644 +--- a/src/lua/CMakeLists.txt ++++ b/src/lua/CMakeLists.txt +@@ -13,9 +13,36 @@ if (LUAJIT_LIBRARIES AND LUAJIT) + DEPENDS ${SRC_LUA} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/squishy + ) + ++ # LuaJIT doesn't use usual arch naming, so we have to convert ++ # between CMake and Luajit while cross-compiling. ++ if (CMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING) ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH "-a") ++ # https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/blob/f0e865dd4861520258299d0f2a56491bd9d602e1/src/jit/bcsave.lua#L30 ++ # https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/blob/f0e865dd4861520258299d0f2a56491bd9d602e1/src/jit/bcsave.lua#L65 ++ if (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR STREQUAL "aarch64") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "arm64") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "aarch64_be") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "arm64be") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "arm") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "arm") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "^(i.86)$") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "x86") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "mips") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "mips") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "mipsel") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "mipsel") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "powerpc") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "ppc") ++ elseif (CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR MATCHES "x86_64") ++ SET (LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} "x64") ++ else() ++ MESSAGE(FATAL_ERROR "${CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR} is not supported by LuaJIT") ++ endif() ++ endif() ++ + ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND( + OUTPUT bcc.o +- COMMAND ${LUAJIT} -bg bcc.lua bcc.o ++ COMMAND ${LUAJIT} -bg bcc.lua ${LUAJIT_TARGET_ARCH} bcc.o + DEPENDS bcc.lua + ) + diff --git a/package/bcc/bcc.mk b/package/bcc/bcc.mk index bafa9e2096..8b6ba63f90 100644 --- a/package/bcc/bcc.mk +++ b/package/bcc/bcc.mk @@ -19,8 +19,14 @@ BCC_DEPENDENCIES = host-bison host-flex clang elfutils flex llvm python3 tar BCC_CONF_OPTS = -DENABLE_LLVM_SHARED=ON \ -DREVISION=$(BCC_VERSION) \ -DENABLE_CLANG_JIT=ON \ - -DENABLE_MAN=OFF \ - -DENABLE_LUAJIT=OFF + -DENABLE_MAN=OFF + +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_LUAJIT),y) +BCC_DEPENDENCIES += luajit +BCC_CONF_OPTS += -DENABLE_LUAJIT=ON +else +BCC_CONF_OPTS += -DENABLE_LUAJIT=OFF +endif define BCC_LINUX_CONFIG_FIXUPS # Enable kernel support for eBPF
The luajit dependency was explicitely disabled when bcc has been added to Buildroot. Even if the python binding is probably more used, enable luajit binding if luajit package is enabled in the defconfig. Fix the luajit command line used to build bcc.o, otherwise bcc.o is build for the host. Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> --- .../bcc/0003-fix-aarch64-cross-compile.patch | 65 +++++++++++++++++++ package/bcc/bcc.mk | 10 ++- 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 package/bcc/0003-fix-aarch64-cross-compile.patch