diff mbox series

[2/7] powerpc: Use TIDR CPU feature to control TIDR allocation

Message ID 20180417020950.21446-3-alastair@au1.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series ocxl: Implement Power9 as_notify/wait for OpenCAPI | expand

Commit Message

Alastair D'Silva April 17, 2018, 2:09 a.m. UTC
From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>

Switch the use of TIDR on it's CPU feature, rather than assuming it
is available based on architecture.

Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Donnellan April 17, 2018, 4:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On 17/04/18 12:09, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> 
> Switch the use of TIDR on it's CPU feature, rather than assuming it
> is available based on architecture.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>

There's a use of TIDR in restore_sprs() that's behind the ARCH_300 flag 
as well, ideally it should never trigger in the !P9_TIDR case, but you 
might want to update that too for clarity?

> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index 1237f13fed51..a3e0a3e06d5a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@ void clear_thread_tidr(struct task_struct *t)
>   	if (!t->thread.tidr)
>   		return;
>   
> -	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
> +	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR)) {
>   		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>   		return;
>   	}
> @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@ int set_thread_tidr(struct task_struct *t)
>   {
>   	int rc;
>   
> -	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> +	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
>   	if (t != current)
>
Alastair D'Silva April 17, 2018, 5:31 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 14:21 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 17/04/18 12:09, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> > 
> > Switch the use of TIDR on it's CPU feature, rather than assuming it
> > is available based on architecture.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> 
> There's a use of TIDR in restore_sprs() that's behind the ARCH_300
> flag 
> as well, ideally it should never trigger in the !P9_TIDR case, but
> you 
> might want to update that too for clarity?
> 

Thanks for the review, I'll include your suggestions in the next set.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index 1237f13fed51..a3e0a3e06d5a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@  void clear_thread_tidr(struct task_struct *t)
 	if (!t->thread.tidr)
 		return;
 
-	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR)) {
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@  int set_thread_tidr(struct task_struct *t)
 {
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (t != current)