[U-Boot,v4,1/2] arm64: sun50i-h5.dtsi : add h5 & a64 compatible to mmc[0-2]

add more specific,  Allwinner H5 SoC, compaitable to mmc0,1,2
current one comes from sun8i-h3.dtsi
compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-mmc", "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";

Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>
---
 arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel?

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org> wrote:
> add more specific,  Allwinner H5 SoC, compaitable to mmc0,1,2
> current one comes from sun8i-h3.dtsi
> compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-mmc", "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mmc";
>
> Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> index 4904c18..1f4c1d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> @@ -75,3 +75,15 @@
>  &gic {
>         compatible = "arm,gic-400";
>  };
> +
> +&mmc0 {
> +       compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-mmc", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> +};
> +
> +&mmc1 {
> +       compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-mmc", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> +};
> +
> +&mmc2 {
> +       compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-mmc", "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> +};
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel?

And add last merge commit details on commit message.

thanks!

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel?
>

I guess syncing could possibly solve the problem! Kernel DTSI got the 
compiltables I need from the begining.

The diff looks big to me. I am not sure yet, I understand all changes.  
Anyone who would like to sync the two files? Or willing to help me?
 
diff ~/u-boot/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi 
~/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
 
> And add last merge commit details on commit message.

A good point. I am wondering what is the practice for this u-boot commit 
message. I do not see commit IDs mentioned. A few commits seems to mention 
kernel version in the commit message.

-antony

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Shouldn't we just be syncing changes to the DT from the kernel?
>>
>
> I guess syncing could possibly solve the problem! Kernel DTSI got the
> compiltables I need from the begining.
>
> The diff looks big to me. I am not sure yet, I understand all changes.
> Anyone who would like to sync the two files? Or willing to help me?
>
> diff ~/u-boot/arch/arm/dts/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> ~/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
>
>> And add last merge commit details on commit message.
>
> A good point. I am wondering what is the practice for this u-boot commit
> message. I do not see commit IDs mentioned. A few commits seems to mention
> kernel version in the commit message.

Getting merge ID details can help to check what details got synced,
not a big deal.

thanks!