Message ID | 1428329107-2294-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Marek Vasut |
Headers | show |
On Monday, April 06, 2015 at 04:05:07 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > Some USB devices break the spec and require longer warm-up times. Allow > the usb_pgood_delay env variable to override the calculated time. > > I have encountered this specficically with several different sized/branded > USB sticks with VID:PID 058f:6387 (Alcor Micro Corp. Transcend JetFlash) > where I need to set usb_pgood_delay to 2000ms to make them detectable. > > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> Hi! this looks like a good idea. I have a hint for improvement -- in case you get a timeout waiting for the device to be detected, maybe the error message should mention that you can try setting this env variable and try again ? Best regards, Marek Vasut
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > On Monday, April 06, 2015 at 04:05:07 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> Some USB devices break the spec and require longer warm-up times. Allow >> the usb_pgood_delay env variable to override the calculated time. >> >> I have encountered this specficically with several different sized/branded >> USB sticks with VID:PID 058f:6387 (Alcor Micro Corp. Transcend JetFlash) >> where I need to set usb_pgood_delay to 2000ms to make them detectable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> > > Hi! > > this looks like a good idea. I have a hint for improvement -- in case you > get a timeout waiting for the device to be detected, maybe the error message > should mention that you can try setting this env variable and try again ? > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut Marek, I'm not sure what 'failed detect' would be appropriate though. In my case I was dealing with storage devices so I think what you are proposing is that on a 'usb start' if 0 storage devices are found display a message such as: No storage devices found - if a connected device is not being detected try setting usb_pgood_delay env var to something above the 1000ms time the USB spec allows Sounds a bit verbose and I'm not clear if it should be limited to USB storage devices or other supported devices (I'm betting its just the storage ones that often break the spec). Stephen, what do you think? You and I discussed adding such an env var about a year ago. Tim
On 04/07/2015 08:52 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: >> On Monday, April 06, 2015 at 04:05:07 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >>> Some USB devices break the spec and require longer warm-up times. Allow >>> the usb_pgood_delay env variable to override the calculated time. >>> >>> I have encountered this specficically with several different sized/branded >>> USB sticks with VID:PID 058f:6387 (Alcor Micro Corp. Transcend JetFlash) >>> where I need to set usb_pgood_delay to 2000ms to make them detectable. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> >> >> Hi! >> >> this looks like a good idea. I have a hint for improvement -- in case you >> get a timeout waiting for the device to be detected, maybe the error message >> should mention that you can try setting this env variable and try again ? >> >> Best regards, >> Marek Vasut > > Marek, > > I'm not sure what 'failed detect' would be appropriate though. In my > case I was dealing with storage devices so I think what you are > proposing is that on a 'usb start' if 0 storage devices are found > display a message such as: > > No storage devices found - if a connected device is not being detected > try setting usb_pgood_delay env var to something above the 1000ms time > the USB spec allows That seems like something better for the documentation that at run-time. There's no reason to believe that the user has any USB storage devices plugged in. > Sounds a bit verbose and I'm not clear if it should be limited to USB > storage devices or other supported devices (I'm betting its just the > storage ones that often break the spec). > > Stephen, what do you think? You and I discussed adding such an env var > about a year ago. If there is some kind of error that's actively detected, it may make sense to print some kind of message. However, if the symptoms are that devices simply don't appear on the bus and there's no reason to believe any are actually plugged in, that fells different.
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 04/07/2015 08:52 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: >>> >>> On Monday, April 06, 2015 at 04:05:07 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: >>>> >>>> Some USB devices break the spec and require longer warm-up times. Allow >>>> the usb_pgood_delay env variable to override the calculated time. >>>> >>>> I have encountered this specficically with several different >>>> sized/branded >>>> USB sticks with VID:PID 058f:6387 (Alcor Micro Corp. Transcend JetFlash) >>>> where I need to set usb_pgood_delay to 2000ms to make them detectable. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> >>> >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> this looks like a good idea. I have a hint for improvement -- in case you >>> get a timeout waiting for the device to be detected, maybe the error >>> message >>> should mention that you can try setting this env variable and try again ? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Marek Vasut >> >> >> Marek, >> >> I'm not sure what 'failed detect' would be appropriate though. In my >> case I was dealing with storage devices so I think what you are >> proposing is that on a 'usb start' if 0 storage devices are found >> display a message such as: >> >> No storage devices found - if a connected device is not being detected >> try setting usb_pgood_delay env var to something above the 1000ms time >> the USB spec allows > > > That seems like something better for the documentation that at run-time. > There's no reason to believe that the user has any USB storage devices > plugged in. > >> Sounds a bit verbose and I'm not clear if it should be limited to USB >> storage devices or other supported devices (I'm betting its just the >> storage ones that often break the spec). >> >> Stephen, what do you think? You and I discussed adding such an env var >> about a year ago. > > > If there is some kind of error that's actively detected, it may make sense > to print some kind of message. However, if the symptoms are that devices > simply don't appear on the bus and there's no reason to believe any are > actually plugged in, that fells different. No error... just failure to detect storage device. I agree such a message for people using 'usb start' for some other usb device is not cool. Let's leave it as-is then if there are no complaints. Tim
On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 at 06:04:36 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: [...] > > If there is some kind of error that's actively detected, it may make > > sense to print some kind of message. However, if the symptoms are that > > devices simply don't appear on the bus and there's no reason to believe > > any are actually plugged in, that fells different. > > No error... just failure to detect storage device. I agree such a > message for people using 'usb start' for some other usb device is not > cool. > > Let's leave it as-is then if there are no complaints. Hi, Is the device recognised on the bus and just not identified OR is the device not even recognised on the bus ? Best regards, Marek Vasut
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 at 06:04:36 PM, Tim Harvey wrote: > [...] > >> > If there is some kind of error that's actively detected, it may make >> > sense to print some kind of message. However, if the symptoms are that >> > devices simply don't appear on the bus and there's no reason to believe >> > any are actually plugged in, that fells different. >> >> No error... just failure to detect storage device. I agree such a >> message for people using 'usb start' for some other usb device is not >> cool. >> >> Let's leave it as-is then if there are no complaints. > > Hi, > > Is the device recognised on the bus and just not identified OR is the device > not even recognised on the bus ? > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut Marek, No timeout - just failure to see Port status change (portstatus/portchange reflect no change on port). I did notice there is a compiler warning with my patch that I missed so I'll re-post it with that resolved if everything else looks ok. Tim
diff --git a/common/usb_hub.c b/common/usb_hub.c index 66b4a72..a0ef058 100644 --- a/common/usb_hub.c +++ b/common/usb_hub.c @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static void usb_hub_power_on(struct usb_hub_device *hub) int i; struct usb_device *dev; unsigned pgood_delay = hub->desc.bPwrOn2PwrGood * 2; + const char *env; dev = hub->pusb_dev; @@ -98,7 +99,13 @@ static void usb_hub_power_on(struct usb_hub_device *hub) /* * Wait for power to become stable, * plus spec-defined max time for device to connect + * but allow this time to be increased via env variable as some + * devices break the spec and require longer warm-up times */ + env = getenv("usb_pgood_delay"); + if (env) + pgood_delay = max(pgood_delay, simple_strtol(env, NULL, 0)); + debug("pgood_delay=%dms\n", pgood_delay); mdelay(pgood_delay + 1000); }
Some USB devices break the spec and require longer warm-up times. Allow the usb_pgood_delay env variable to override the calculated time. I have encountered this specficically with several different sized/branded USB sticks with VID:PID 058f:6387 (Alcor Micro Corp. Transcend JetFlash) where I need to set usb_pgood_delay to 2000ms to make them detectable. Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> --- common/usb_hub.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)