diff mbox

vfio: change the order of includes to fix build on CentOS 5

Message ID 1442240110-26006-1-git-send-email-leon.alrae@imgtec.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Leon Alrae Sept. 14, 2015, 2:15 p.m. UTC
Include linux/vfio.h after sys/ioctl.h, just like in hw/vfio/common.c and
hw/vfio/platform.c.

This fixes the regression caused by the change in commit d7646f2:

 CC    mips-softmmu/hw/vfio/pci.o
 In file included from /work/qemu/hw/vfio/pci.c:24:
 /usr/include/sys/stat.h:44: error: conflicting types for ‘dev_t’
 /usr/include/linux/types.h:13: error: previous declaration of ‘dev_t’ was here
 /usr/include/sys/stat.h:92: error: conflicting types for ‘blkcnt_t’
 /usr/include/linux/types.h:114: error: previous declaration of ‘blkcnt_t’ was here
 In file included from /work/qemu/hw/vfio/pci.c:25:
 /usr/include/sys/types.h:46: error: conflicting types for ‘loff_t’
 /usr/include/linux/types.h:30: error: previous declaration of ‘loff_t’ was here
 In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:133,
                  from /work/qemu/hw/vfio/pci.c:25:
...

Signed-off-by: Leon Alrae <leon.alrae@imgtec.com>
---
 hw/vfio/pci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Eric Blake Sept. 14, 2015, 3:59 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09/14/2015 08:15 AM, Leon Alrae wrote:
> Include linux/vfio.h after sys/ioctl.h, just like in hw/vfio/common.c and
> hw/vfio/platform.c.
> 
> This fixes the regression caused by the change in commit d7646f2:

How much longer are we planning on building on CentOS 5? Didn't we
already break things with a glib minimum requirement in qemu 2.5, plus
the now-pending bump to python 2.6?

While I'm not opposed to this patch, I'm wondering if it will make any
real difference.
Peter Maydell Sept. 14, 2015, 4:04 p.m. UTC | #2
On 14 September 2015 at 16:59, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 08:15 AM, Leon Alrae wrote:
>> Include linux/vfio.h after sys/ioctl.h, just like in hw/vfio/common.c and
>> hw/vfio/platform.c.
>>
>> This fixes the regression caused by the change in commit d7646f2:
>
> How much longer are we planning on building on CentOS 5? Didn't we
> already break things with a glib minimum requirement in qemu 2.5, plus
> the now-pending bump to python 2.6?

It's not supported by us (upstream) any more (since 2.4).

> While I'm not opposed to this patch, I'm wondering if it will make any
> real difference.

Anybody wanting to build on Centos 5 is going to need to start
building/backporting their dependent libraries and build tools,
yes. But where the changes to fix compilation issues are trivial,
like this one, I don't see any reason for us not to accept them.

thanks
-- PMM
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index 73d34b9..5f74fbe 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ 
  *  Copyright (C) 2008, IBM, Muli Ben-Yehuda (muli@il.ibm.com)
  */
 
-#include <linux/vfio.h>
 #include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <linux/vfio.h>
 #include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>