Message ID | 1415598889-11244-1-git-send-email-syeon.hwang@samsung.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 02:54:49PM +0900, SeokYeon Hwang wrote: > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Amos Kong <kongjianjun@gmail.com> > --- > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > util/error.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c > index 58455bd..2902f7d 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice *hotplug_dev, > /* the slot is electromechanically locked. > * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. > */ > - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); > + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); > } > } > > diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c > index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 100644 > --- a/util/error.c > +++ b/util/error.c > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, ErrorClass err_class, > return; > } > assert(*errp == NULL); > + assert(os_errno >= 0); > > err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err)); > > -- > 2.1.0 >
On 2014-11-10 at 06:54, SeokYeon Hwang wrote: > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> > --- > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > util/error.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c > index 58455bd..2902f7d 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice *hotplug_dev, > /* the slot is electromechanically locked. > * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. > */ > - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); > + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); > } > } > > diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c > index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 100644 > --- a/util/error.c > +++ b/util/error.c > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, ErrorClass err_class, > return; > } > assert(*errp == NULL); > + assert(os_errno >= 0); > > err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err)); > Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> writes: > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> > --- > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > util/error.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c > index 58455bd..2902f7d 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice *hotplug_dev, > /* the slot is electromechanically locked. > * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. > */ > - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); > + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); > } > } > > diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c > index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 100644 > --- a/util/error.c > +++ b/util/error.c > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, ErrorClass err_class, > return; > } > assert(*errp == NULL); > + assert(os_errno >= 0); > > err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err)); The first hunk could still go into 2.2 as a bug fix. The rest can't. You could post just the first hunk as "[PATCH for-2.2] pci: Don't pass negative errno to error_set_errno()", with my R-by. Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:armbru@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 6:33 PM > To: SeokYeon Hwang > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kongjianjun@gmail.com; paolo.bonzini@gmail.com; > mreitz@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] error: passing a negative value to an > os_errno is wrong > > SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> writes: > > > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. > > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > > > > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> > > --- > > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > > util/error.c | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c index 58455bd..2902f7d > > 100644 > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice > *hotplug_dev, > > /* the slot is electromechanically locked. > > * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. > > */ > > - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically > locked"); > > + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically > > + locked"); > > } > > } > > > > diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 100644 > > --- a/util/error.c > > +++ b/util/error.c > > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, > ErrorClass err_class, > > return; > > } > > assert(*errp == NULL); > > + assert(os_errno >= 0); > > > > err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err)); > > The first hunk could still go into 2.2 as a bug fix. The rest can't. > You could post just the first hunk as "[PATCH for-2.2] pci: Don't pass > negative errno to error_set_errno()", with my R-by. > > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Did you mean separate this patch into two patches ?? One is "PATCH v4" and the other is "PATCH for-2.2". Am I right?? And I have a question. (I don't know review / merge process well.) What happens to the "reviewed" but "not bug-fix" patch during "feature freeze" time ?? Thanks.
SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:armbru@redhat.com] >> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 6:33 PM >> To: SeokYeon Hwang >> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kongjianjun@gmail.com; paolo.bonzini@gmail.com; >> mreitz@redhat.com >> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] error: passing a negative value to an >> os_errno is wrong >> >> SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> writes: >> >> > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. >> > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> >> > --- >> > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- >> > util/error.c | 1 + >> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c index 58455bd..2902f7d >> > 100644 >> > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c >> > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c >> > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice >> *hotplug_dev, >> > /* the slot is electromechanically locked. >> > * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. >> > */ >> > - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically >> locked"); >> > + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically >> > + locked"); >> > } >> > } >> > >> > diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 100644 >> > --- a/util/error.c >> > +++ b/util/error.c >> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, >> ErrorClass err_class, >> > return; >> > } >> > assert(*errp == NULL); >> > + assert(os_errno >= 0); >> > >> > err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err)); >> >> The first hunk could still go into 2.2 as a bug fix. The rest can't. >> You could post just the first hunk as "[PATCH for-2.2] pci: Don't pass >> negative errno to error_set_errno()", with my R-by. >> >> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> > > Did you mean separate this patch into two patches ?? > One is "PATCH v4" and the other is "PATCH for-2.2". Am I right?? Yes. > And I have a question. (I don't know review / merge process well.) > What happens to the "reviewed" but "not bug-fix" patch during "feature > freeze" time ?? They get applied when the next development cycle opens. If they don't, you have to remind the maintainer(s).
On 11/09/2014 10:54 PM, SeokYeon Hwang wrote: > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. Commit message... > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> > --- > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > +++ b/util/error.c > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, ErrorClass err_class, > return; > } > assert(*errp == NULL); > + assert(os_errno >= 0); ...does not match code. (Code is correct).
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Blake [mailto:eblake@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 1:14 AM > To: SeokYeon Hwang; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: paolo.bonzini@gmail.com; armbru@redhat.com; mreitz@redhat.com; > kongjianjun@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] error: passing a negative value to an os_errno is > wrong > > On 11/09/2014 10:54 PM, SeokYeon Hwang wrote: > > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. > > Commit message... > > > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > > > > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> > > --- > > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > > > +++ b/util/error.c > > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, > ErrorClass err_class, > > return; > > } > > assert(*errp == NULL); > > + assert(os_errno >= 0); > > ...does not match code. (Code is correct). > > -- > Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org You're right. Thank you.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:armbru@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 10:21 PM > To: SeokYeon Hwang > Cc: kongjianjun@gmail.com; paolo.bonzini@gmail.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; > mreitz@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] error: passing a negative value to an > os_errno is wrong > > SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> writes: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:armbru@redhat.com] > >> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 6:33 PM > >> To: SeokYeon Hwang > >> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; kongjianjun@gmail.com; > >> paolo.bonzini@gmail.com; mreitz@redhat.com > >> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] error: passing a negative value > >> to an os_errno is wrong > >> > >> SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> writes: > >> > >> > Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. > >> > Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> > >> > --- > >> > hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- > >> > util/error.c | 1 + > >> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c index 58455bd..2902f7d > >> > 100644 > >> > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > >> > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > >> > @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void > >> > pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice > >> *hotplug_dev, > >> > /* the slot is electromechanically locked. > >> > * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. > >> > */ > >> > - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically > >> locked"); > >> > + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically > >> > + locked"); > >> > } > >> > } > >> > > >> > diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 > >> > 100644 > >> > --- a/util/error.c > >> > +++ b/util/error.c > >> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, > >> ErrorClass err_class, > >> > return; > >> > } > >> > assert(*errp == NULL); > >> > + assert(os_errno >= 0); > >> > > >> > err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err)); > >> > >> The first hunk could still go into 2.2 as a bug fix. The rest can't. > >> You could post just the first hunk as "[PATCH for-2.2] pci: Don't > >> pass negative errno to error_set_errno()", with my R-by. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> > > > > Did you mean separate this patch into two patches ?? > > One is "PATCH v4" and the other is "PATCH for-2.2". Am I right?? > > Yes. > > > And I have a question. (I don't know review / merge process well.) > > What happens to the "reviewed" but "not bug-fix" patch during "feature > > freeze" time ?? > > They get applied when the next development cycle opens. If they don't, > you have to remind the maintainer(s). I just posted separated two patches. Thank you for your advice.
diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c index 58455bd..2902f7d 100644 --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCIDevice *hotplug_dev, /* the slot is electromechanically locked. * This error is propagated up to qdev and then to HMP/QMP. */ - error_setg_errno(errp, -EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); + error_setg_errno(errp, EBUSY, "slot is electromechanically locked"); } } diff --git a/util/error.c b/util/error.c index 2ace0d8..6c9d995 100644 --- a/util/error.c +++ b/util/error.c @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ void error_set_errno(Error **errp, int os_errno, ErrorClass err_class, return; } assert(*errp == NULL); + assert(os_errno >= 0); err = g_malloc0(sizeof(*err));
Added 'assert(os_errno > 0)' in 'error_set_errno()'. Fixed errno since it passes wrong value to 'error_set_errno()'. Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com> --- hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +- util/error.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)