| Message ID | YZPA+gSsGWI6+xBP@work |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] PCI: Add func1 DMA quirk for Marvell 88SE9125 SATA controller | expand |
Hi, Thank you for sending the patch over to fix this! > Like other SATA controller chips in the Marvell 88SE91xx series, the > Marvell 88SE9125 has the same DMA requester ID hardware bug that prevents > it from working under IOMMU. This patch adds its device ID 0x9125 to the > Function 1 DMA alias quirk list. [...] > Reported-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> > Tested-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> Both of these tags would require a proper full name, if possible, rather than a name that is abbreviated and/or a username. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@liunx.com> Krzysztof
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote: > > Reported-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> > > Tested-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> > > Both of these tags would require a proper full name, if possible, rather > than a name that is abbreviated and/or a username. > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@liunx.com> > > Krzysztof No problem, I'll send a revision to correct the tags immediately. Cheers, Yifeng Li
Hi, > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 04:49:54PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote: > > > Reported-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> > > > Tested-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> > > > > Both of these tags would require a proper full name, if possible, rather > > than a name that is abbreviated and/or a username. > > > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@liunx.com> > > > > Krzysztof > > No problem, I'll send a revision to correct the tags immediately. No worries! Thank you! Krzysztof
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:32:26PM +0000, Yifeng Li wrote: > Like other SATA controller chips in the Marvell 88SE91xx series, the > Marvell 88SE9125 has the same DMA requester ID hardware bug that prevents > it from working under IOMMU. This patch adds its device ID 0x9125 to the > Function 1 DMA alias quirk list. Btw, do we need to prevent vfio assignment for all devices with this quirk?
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:12:04 -0800 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 02:32:26PM +0000, Yifeng Li wrote: > > Like other SATA controller chips in the Marvell 88SE91xx series, the > > Marvell 88SE9125 has the same DMA requester ID hardware bug that prevents > > it from working under IOMMU. This patch adds its device ID 0x9125 to the > > Function 1 DMA alias quirk list. > > Btw, do we need to prevent vfio assignment for all devices with this > quirk? No, the alias is taken into account with grouping and IOMMU programming, it should work with vfio. Thanks, Alex
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c index 003950c73..20a932690 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c @@ -4103,6 +4103,9 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL_EXT, 0x9120, quirk_dma_func1_alias); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL_EXT, 0x9123, quirk_dma_func1_alias); +/* https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42679#c136 */ +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL_EXT, 0x9125, + quirk_dma_func1_alias); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL_EXT, 0x9128, quirk_dma_func1_alias); /* https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42679#c14 */
Like other SATA controller chips in the Marvell 88SE91xx series, the Marvell 88SE9125 has the same DMA requester ID hardware bug that prevents it from working under IOMMU. This patch adds its device ID 0x9125 to the Function 1 DMA alias quirk list. This patch should not be confused with an earlier patch, commit 059983790a4c ("PCI: Add function 1 DMA alias quirk for Marvell 9215 SATA controller"), which applies to a different chip with a similar model number, 88SE9215. Without this patch, device initialization fails with DMA errors. ata8: softreset failed (1st FIS failed) DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 DMAR: [DMA Write NO_PASID] Request device [03:00.1] fault addr 0xfffc0000 [fault reason 0x02] Present bit in context entry is clear DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 DMAR: [DMA Read NO_PASID] Request device [03:00.1] fault addr 0xfffc0000 [fault reason 0x02] Present bit in context entry is clear After applying the patch, the controller can be successfully initialized. ata8: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 330) ata8.00: ATAPI: PIONEER BD-RW BDR-207M, 1.21, max UDMA/100 ata8.00: configured for UDMA/100 scsi 7:0:0:0: CD-ROM PIONEER BD-RW BDR-207M 1.21 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> Tested-by: sbingner <sam@bingner.com> Tested-by: Yifeng Li <tomli@tomli.me> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Li <tomli@tomli.me> --- Notes: I accidentally sent an earlier version of the commit without CCing stable@vger.kernel.org. The mail itself was also rejected by many servers due to a DKIM issue. Thus [PATCH v2], sorry for the noise. drivers/pci/quirks.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)