Message ID | 20211029172633.886453-8-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Ambarus Tudor |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=f7kldDJs; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mchp header.b=V8WSTBAY; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HgqSX5d3sz9sRK for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 04:39:56 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=FJlRw1do/F5A0Afq1PG9fyb4Nggd4UgYc3MErC6M9P4=; b=f7kldDJsigKJtr rHXBqIMuQ1mLdkrObMIuQucWreWqb/2bi5Bg/+axeT5LqYN0SRNNHPFaL8NHwyliJgO4EtP3oVZg3 BMxkl6Y/KD3noHkL4nxpyb1UiS7fb0EAX6pLag79A1bka77yR2cy9ziPeiJuyjw5whW2AtCxnAwcC 3YD0oQul1CSjdp9b8ilM5hDoZcMYJhUbj1SfnHKfJcP2unMvmFrFtnqGNmTlG0w/phd7iLTQgSVwG I8uFSMGW6bIzdrQndw9YZZpUuXo8WHLCVVnxSiBPTNbDFcrbGTh05gJ488Zu9ISvjlRLBMllPfmuT ol6gLU+ms8k4zbFR/UDQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mgVqT-00BcVb-9P; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:39:13 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.233]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mgVf3-00BZAg-2k; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:27:26 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1635528444; x=1667064444; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=41oivS8KYWvrWmD2Cjvk5Iu1SvhxO4AZNDJiqciUMd0=; b=V8WSTBAY6LevSIAvHcjQ1yX8w0+xPMV9cd9ZwfCyXRdGMjzpNLLrKJun CXRIgFayOlrIt2rkPvUoMtjHpNlBoB61BZJQKM6WXnG1RA1Cs7J/Dvm2O 82PscZMgY998ZPh6NjHxNMycPCTgUAMZzI9sEM17E+iI8R8NsRkln781S EnxF0+cNrxNNLZzGg+ABhrGPHHeVtsB33xXnhxZBF03yxafPtlD+KpqAl bbuEMxwxPNWMbff7PcqW4Q5H/ygX/40mEIVvQPlo/5Vk942VZzS92OdoC BZXYL76tapj//vdyrT8ffOxgmY5784E2qYtuonNKjX/2vRR4/JeuU2ECi Q==; IronPort-SDR: g6VhlUI/LjM/ENxq1Q0nIfG1GatYew17VmDHk85kArnD0HJB6SDVuGWHTQ8B7jdd0nk9YFtHNx UuZFwXpkI9+jrwD3aY3OU3ukhXGxti6DZobJ/558B1F6Yc0aP+80OpQm/w7dyVa9FeKDqlG68B i3BIDArUvcx9zQhya+GdkXNw00CqsjJF53fNp5EMaC0C6ZCb3zBgR1RGr8S1Ik8MxcYwujfDW7 JKl36jDzQ0ImuNYdY4OGtfN4Hw8SXJecpVyqtzE+mHAaHhyFRioVQ8/2i8ORpM5JCb3yj/qW2b rh5e+iHG/kn29yUb8H5cbwMM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,193,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="142183485" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 29 Oct 2021 10:27:23 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:27:15 -0700 Received: from ROB-ULT-M18064N.mchp-main.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:27:10 -0700 From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> To: <michael@walle.cc>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <p.yadav@ti.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 07/25] mtd: spi-nor: sst: Use flash late_init() for locking Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:26:15 +0300 Message-ID: <20211029172633.886453-8-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20211029172633.886453-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> References: <20211029172633.886453-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211029_102725_194552_B2ACFAB8 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.32 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Locking is not described in JESD216 SFDP standard, place the locking init in late_init(). Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [68.232.153.233 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [68.232.153.233 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.2 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: macromorgan@hotmail.com, jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>, richard@nod.at, esben@geanix.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, knaerzche@gmail.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, code@reto-schneider.ch, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, heiko.thiery@gmail.com, sr@denx.de, mail@david-bauer.net, zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
mtd: spi-nor: Clean params init
|
expand
|
Am 2021-10-29 19:26, schrieb Tudor Ambarus: > Locking is not described in JESD216 SFDP standard, place the > locking init in late_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
On 29/10/21 08:26PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > Locking is not described in JESD216 SFDP standard, place the > locking init in late_init(). > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c index 980f4c09c91d..660aabde477a 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c @@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ static const struct spi_nor_locking_ops sst26vf_locking_ops = { .is_locked = sst26vf_is_locked, }; -static void sst26vf_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor) +static void sst26vf_late_init(struct spi_nor *nor) { nor->params->locking_ops = &sst26vf_locking_ops; } static const struct spi_nor_fixups sst26vf_fixups = { - .default_init = sst26vf_default_init, + .late_init = sst26vf_late_init, }; static const struct flash_info sst_parts[] = {
Locking is not described in JESD216 SFDP standard, place the locking init in late_init(). Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)