Message ID | 20211029172633.886453-10-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Ambarus Tudor |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=p9ii9qnp; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mchp header.b=ACIFeFD7; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org (client-ip=2607:7c80:54:e::133; helo=bombadil.infradead.org; envelope-from=linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org; receiver=<UNKNOWN>) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HgqXV5lnvz9sRK for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 04:43:22 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=X90xYkKkIqwW/X+70YymlwroRRp255shu44SX7UG7NI=; b=p9ii9qnpzyG9gX a9nGLqAgCwZZGhb8MJDcHS5TcN5wuLprVSOyxkDkPM6v4N+Sf9NuKfGAZOsPdgRJej5zfjwVFfLEV /YJdDNbPRVCHcnwfhsHDz2rX9fCj26dCl44Sk6gUxisoVqNJFWT98+8aEB1ZL0Qm3EU6IGSzLubjc lQFBAo/cggj2MX4CX36WD/wTCCsCFmdzL9kJ/a4cMxeWGeJa+q6B0fKVtOVgF/+Dua6Bo49FNPxMt ZNa3DzTl6OZYdFVSqakurGjT+qBcWDtPH2VkrbYH7y6PS/iUOenMX+z4VmBTiq8JIVe+XWXfCSdzL P4dS6FHwTQHWMqX1F3DA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mgVtr-00BdFW-OA; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:42:43 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.153.233]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mgVfA-00BZFH-V6; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 17:27:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1635528452; x=1667064452; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qh3l2t9hCCvugDDhvYkEpFAfmmOdyntyWtWRo/GiZXQ=; b=ACIFeFD7pUTC3z6W5qtunoZNw2SFHFKRQaA+EF1NY9R1iIB9k+PH21p6 fES/SwuOrFg/RcydjT+vgnqZ821RVMzLFkQ4DMlxfo6tu3/q3Cs0CuWe0 8h2WkfxWgYSjHqhTKgngxUCS+vdOjRInHZCvlJcdbAyoNxr/lGh9oWg6r nz42tyQdPegzGhmJ9sdGBmKQhL+5aLuRU1lkzFt5WYO7Zpg7goNZS/tIv QvwFBbA3xPGBH2B6A3nA9q6l2CjYVxkq+WikkJubkeJ/AIPGJZ/RnVJYy 4PfTz3SMRtdGAW0VEWrabD1C3y+t2J/Q+k/wbfeO1V5DXNh2+6C12MEFl w==; IronPort-SDR: vwMddPe+IVget9vxXJFdeBHCjQYpseZIUjjzffvw9mHta0PHZ/YzohUhHvgJaAyT0qLrEL/kLS zBdsMHgil997jLUXlIxuJ67aL4y8uvKssvh3hVuKEXmWLihWaUKk4NBtLI3sB0vD5Zqtw+LGdn eddoJq5StLayR1PhxH0HuBsILbVLYwAkna8Jb44Wpdkr2KEobXuJX0D1UIj/gjliO8fU5v+/pc nNHavaBfaBliPs054DTiZTiKTNHznx2zPs8IplnGgfp2TQMH/BHRQwdhGUr6l/V69+qpuht6RH 41go2Chvs8ImzQfDAMRVyXBS X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,193,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="150063375" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 29 Oct 2021 10:27:32 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.14; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:27:25 -0700 Received: from ROB-ULT-M18064N.mchp-main.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.14 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:27:21 -0700 From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> To: <michael@walle.cc>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <p.yadav@ti.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 09/25] mtd: spi-nor: xilinx: Use manufacturer late_init() to set setup method Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:26:17 +0300 Message-ID: <20211029172633.886453-10-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20211029172633.886453-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> References: <20211029172633.886453-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211029_102733_052179_33B90346 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.29 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bombadil.infradead.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: post_sfdp was misleading in this case, as SFDP is not supported by xilinx. Plus, there's no fixup here, just setting the correct setup method, as required by xilinx parts. Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xilinx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [68.232.153.233 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [68.232.153.233 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.2 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>, <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: macromorgan@hotmail.com, jaimeliao@mxic.com.tw, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>, richard@nod.at, esben@geanix.com, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, knaerzche@gmail.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, code@reto-schneider.ch, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, heiko.thiery@gmail.com, sr@denx.de, mail@david-bauer.net, zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
mtd: spi-nor: Clean params init
|
expand
|
Am 2021-10-29 19:26, schrieb Tudor Ambarus: > post_sfdp was misleading in this case, as SFDP is not supported by > xilinx. Plus, there's no fixup here, just setting the correct > setup method, as required by xilinx parts. > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
On 29/10/21 08:26PM, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > post_sfdp was misleading in this case, as SFDP is not supported by > xilinx. Plus, there's no fixup here, just setting the correct > setup method, as required by xilinx parts. > > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xilinx.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xilinx.c index 0658e47564ba..7e970ccf7903 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xilinx.c @@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ static int xilinx_nor_setup(struct spi_nor *nor, return 0; } -static void xilinx_post_sfdp_fixups(struct spi_nor *nor) +static void xilinx_late_init(struct spi_nor *nor) { nor->params->setup = xilinx_nor_setup; } static const struct spi_nor_fixups xilinx_fixups = { - .post_sfdp = xilinx_post_sfdp_fixups, + .late_init = xilinx_late_init, }; const struct spi_nor_manufacturer spi_nor_xilinx = {
post_sfdp was misleading in this case, as SFDP is not supported by xilinx. Plus, there's no fixup here, just setting the correct setup method, as required by xilinx parts. Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> --- drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xilinx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)