Message ID | 20240229124246.309304-2-cem@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | Handled Elsewhere |
Headers | show |
Series | Add riscv tests to cover the base extension specs | expand |
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:42:07PM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote: > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org> > > Factor out vendor id test to a new helper, and add a new test for probing the > SBI extension. > Compare the retrieved value against an environment variable, as the > implementation can return any non-zero value. > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > --- > riscv/sbi.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c > index ffb07a25..9dc82ecb 100644 > --- a/riscv/sbi.c > +++ b/riscv/sbi.c > @@ -14,28 +14,56 @@ static void help(void) > puts("An environ must be provided where expected values are given.\n"); > } > > -int main(int argc, char **argv) > +static void check_base(void) > { > struct sbiret ret; > long expected; > > - if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) { > - help(); > - exit(0); > - } > - > - report_prefix_push("sbi"); > + report_prefix_push("base"); > > if (!getenv("MVENDORID")) { > report_skip("mvendorid: missing MVENDORID environment variable"); > - goto done; > + return; We don't want to bail on all SBI base tests when a single expected value environment variable is missing, but, looking ahead, I see the pattern changes with the next patch to only skip the one test, so this patch is fine. > } > + > + report_prefix_push("mvendorid"); > expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0); > > - ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); > - report(!ret.error, "mvendorid: no error"); > - report(ret.value == expected, "mvendorid"); > + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, > + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); We use the Linux kernel's coding style (we encourage running the kernel's checkpatch on patches). The kernel allows 100 chars and we're even more tolerant of long lines in kvm-unit-tests. The zeros in sbi_ecall can be annoying, though, so feel free to create a wrapper for a short-hand. > + > + report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error"); > + report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value"); > + report_prefix_pop(); > + > + if (!getenv("PROBE_EXT")) { > + report_skip("probe_ext: missing PROBE_EXT environment variable"); > + return; > + } > + > + report_prefix_push("probe_ext"); > + expected = strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0); > + > + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, > + SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); > + > + report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error"); > + report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value"); I think the expected value environment variable (PROBE_EXT) can be optional in this case. Most implementations will return 0 or 1, particularly for probing the Base extension. So, here I'd do expected = getenv("PROBE_EXT") ? strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0) : 1; > + report_prefix_pop(); > + > + report_prefix_pop(); > +} > + > +int main(int argc, char **argv) > +{ > + > + if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) { > + help(); > + exit(0); > + } > + > + report_prefix_push("sbi"); > + check_base(); > > -done: > return report_summary(); > } > -- > 2.43.2 > Thanks, drew
diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c index ffb07a25..9dc82ecb 100644 --- a/riscv/sbi.c +++ b/riscv/sbi.c @@ -14,28 +14,56 @@ static void help(void) puts("An environ must be provided where expected values are given.\n"); } -int main(int argc, char **argv) +static void check_base(void) { struct sbiret ret; long expected; - if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) { - help(); - exit(0); - } - - report_prefix_push("sbi"); + report_prefix_push("base"); if (!getenv("MVENDORID")) { report_skip("mvendorid: missing MVENDORID environment variable"); - goto done; + return; } + + report_prefix_push("mvendorid"); expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0); - ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); - report(!ret.error, "mvendorid: no error"); - report(ret.value == expected, "mvendorid"); + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + + report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error"); + report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value"); + report_prefix_pop(); + + if (!getenv("PROBE_EXT")) { + report_skip("probe_ext: missing PROBE_EXT environment variable"); + return; + } + + report_prefix_push("probe_ext"); + expected = strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0); + + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, + SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); + + report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error"); + report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value"); + report_prefix_pop(); + + report_prefix_pop(); +} + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + + if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) { + help(); + exit(0); + } + + report_prefix_push("sbi"); + check_base(); -done: return report_summary(); }