diff mbox series

[1/6] riscv: Add test to probe SBI Extension

Message ID 20240229124246.309304-2-cem@kernel.org
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series Add riscv tests to cover the base extension specs | expand

Commit Message

Carlos Maiolino Feb. 29, 2024, 12:42 p.m. UTC
From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>

Factor out vendor id test to a new helper, and add a new test for probing the
SBI extension.
Compare the retrieved value against an environment variable, as the
implementation can return any non-zero value.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
---
 riscv/sbi.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Jones March 1, 2024, 8:25 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:42:07PM +0100, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> 
> Factor out vendor id test to a new helper, and add a new test for probing the
> SBI extension.
> Compare the retrieved value against an environment variable, as the
> implementation can return any non-zero value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
>  riscv/sbi.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index ffb07a25..9dc82ecb 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -14,28 +14,56 @@ static void help(void)
>  	puts("An environ must be provided where expected values are given.\n");
>  }
>  
> -int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +static void check_base(void)
>  {
>  	struct sbiret ret;
>  	long expected;
>  
> -	if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) {
> -		help();
> -		exit(0);
> -	}
> -
> -	report_prefix_push("sbi");
> +	report_prefix_push("base");
>  
>  	if (!getenv("MVENDORID")) {
>  		report_skip("mvendorid: missing MVENDORID environment variable");
> -		goto done;
> +		return;

We don't want to bail on all SBI base tests when a single expected value
environment variable is missing, but, looking ahead, I see the pattern
changes with the next patch to only skip the one test, so this patch is
fine.

>  	}
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("mvendorid");
>  	expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0);
>  
> -	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> -	report(!ret.error, "mvendorid: no error");
> -	report(ret.value == expected, "mvendorid");
> +	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID,
> +			0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);

We use the Linux kernel's coding style (we encourage running the kernel's
checkpatch on patches). The kernel allows 100 chars and we're even more
tolerant of long lines in kvm-unit-tests. The zeros in sbi_ecall can be
annoying, though, so feel free to create a wrapper for a short-hand.

> +
> +	report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
> +	report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	if (!getenv("PROBE_EXT")) {
> +		report_skip("probe_ext: missing PROBE_EXT environment variable");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("probe_ext");
> +	expected = strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0);
> +
> +	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT,
> +			SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +
> +	report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
> +	report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");

I think the expected value environment variable (PROBE_EXT) can be
optional in this case. Most implementations will return 0 or 1,
particularly for probing the Base extension. So, here I'd do

 expected = getenv("PROBE_EXT") ? strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0) : 1; 

> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +
> +	if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) {
> +		help();
> +		exit(0);
> +	}
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("sbi");
> +	check_base();
>  
> -done:
>  	return report_summary();
>  }
> -- 
> 2.43.2
>

Thanks,
drew
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
index ffb07a25..9dc82ecb 100644
--- a/riscv/sbi.c
+++ b/riscv/sbi.c
@@ -14,28 +14,56 @@  static void help(void)
 	puts("An environ must be provided where expected values are given.\n");
 }
 
-int main(int argc, char **argv)
+static void check_base(void)
 {
 	struct sbiret ret;
 	long expected;
 
-	if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) {
-		help();
-		exit(0);
-	}
-
-	report_prefix_push("sbi");
+	report_prefix_push("base");
 
 	if (!getenv("MVENDORID")) {
 		report_skip("mvendorid: missing MVENDORID environment variable");
-		goto done;
+		return;
 	}
+
+	report_prefix_push("mvendorid");
 	expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0);
 
-	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
-	report(!ret.error, "mvendorid: no error");
-	report(ret.value == expected, "mvendorid");
+	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID,
+			0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+
+	report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
+	report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	if (!getenv("PROBE_EXT")) {
+		report_skip("probe_ext: missing PROBE_EXT environment variable");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	report_prefix_push("probe_ext");
+	expected = strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0);
+
+	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT,
+			SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+
+	report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
+	report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+
+	if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) {
+		help();
+		exit(0);
+	}
+
+	report_prefix_push("sbi");
+	check_base();
 
-done:
 	return report_summary();
 }