@@ -245,6 +245,25 @@ (define_memory_constraint "es"
(and (match_code "mem")
(match_test "GET_RTX_CLASS (GET_CODE (XEXP (op, 0))) != RTX_AUTOINC")))
+;; Non-prefixed memory
+(define_memory_constraint "em"
+ "@internal Memory operand that is not prefixed."
+ (and (match_code "mem")
+ (not (match_operand 0 "prefixed_memory"))))
+
+;; Non-prefixed memory that is also offsettable
+(define_memory_constraint "eo"
+ "@internal Memory operand that is not prefixed but is offsettable."
+ (and (match_code "mem")
+ (not (match_operand 0 "prefixed_memory"))
+ (match_operand 0 "offsettable_mem_operand")))
+
+;; prefixed memory
+(define_memory_constraint "ep"
+ "@internal Memory operand that is prefixed."
+ (and (match_code "mem")
+ (match_operand 0 "prefixed_memory")))
+
(define_memory_constraint "Q"
"A memory operand addressed by just a base register."
(and (match_code "mem")
@@ -3414,9 +3414,63 @@ rs6000_builtin_mask_calculate (void)
static rtx_insn *
rs6000_md_asm_adjust (vec<rtx> &/*outputs*/, vec<rtx> &/*inputs*/,
- vec<const char *> &/*constraints*/,
+ vec<const char *> &constraints,
vec<rtx> &clobbers, HARD_REG_SET &clobbered_regs)
{
+ /* If prefixed addresses are allowed, change the "m" constraint to "em" and
+ the "o" constraint to "eo". The "em" and "eo" constraints do not allow
+ prefixed memory. */
+ if (TARGET_PREFIXED)
+ {
+ size_t max_len = 0;
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < constraints.length (); ++i)
+ {
+ size_t len = strlen (constraints[i]);
+ if (len > max_len)
+ max_len = len;
+ }
+
+ char *buffer = (char *) alloca (2 * max_len + 1);
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < constraints.length (); ++i)
+ {
+ const char *constraint = constraints[i];
+ char *new_constraint = buffer;
+ char ch;
+ bool found_m_or_o = false;
+
+ while ((ch = *constraint++) != '\0')
+ switch (ch)
+ {
+ default:
+ *new_constraint++ = ch;
+ break;
+
+ /* If we found 'm' or 'o', convert it to 'em' or 'eo' so that
+ prefixed memory is not allowed. */
+ case 'm':
+ case 'o':
+ found_m_or_o = true;
+ *new_constraint++ = 'e';
+ *new_constraint++ = ch;
+ break;
+
+ /* 'e' and 'w' begin two letter constraints. */
+ case 'e':
+ case 'w':
+ *new_constraint++ = ch;
+ *new_constraint++ = *constraint++;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* If we had 'm' or 'o', update the constraints. */
+ if (found_m_or_o)
+ {
+ *new_constraint = '\0';
+ constraints[i] = xstrdup (buffer);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
clobbers.safe_push (gen_rtx_REG (SImode, CA_REGNO));
SET_HARD_REG_BIT (clobbered_regs, CA_REGNO);
return NULL;
@@ -3369,6 +3369,15 @@ are now only allowed when @code{<} or @code{>} is used, @code{es} is
basically the same as @code{m} without @code{<} and @code{>}.
@end ifset
+@item em
+A memory operand that is not prefixed.
+
+@item eo
+A memory operand that is offsettable but it is not prefixed.
+
+@item ep
+A memory operand that is prefixed.
+
@item Q
A memory operand addressed by just a base register.
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10" } */
+
+typedef vector double vf64_t;
+
+static double test_f64[16];
+
+vf64_t
+bug (void)
+{
+ vf64_t j0;
+ __asm__("lxsd%X1 %0,%1;" : "=v" (j0) : "m" (test_f64));
+ return j0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\m[@]pcrel\M} } } */
From 4ceff15935a16da9ec5833279807855a8afc47cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:19:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make asm not contain prefixed addresses. In PR target/98519, the assembler does not like asm memory references that are prefixed. We can't automatically change the instruction to prefixed form with a 'p' like we do for normal RTL insns, since this is assembly code. Instead, the patch prevents prefixed memory addresses from being passed by default. This patch uses the TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST target hook to change the 'm' and 'o' constraints to be 'em' and 'eo'. The 'em' and 'eo' constraints do not allow prefixed instructions. In addition, a new constraint 'ep' is added to explicitly require a prefixed instruction. I have tested this on a little endian power9 system in doing a bootstrap build and make check. There were no regressions. Can I check this into the master branch? I would like to also backport this change to the GCC 10 branch, since the bug can happen in that release as well. [gcc] 2021-02-01 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com> PR target/98519 * config/rs6000/constraints.md (em): New constraint. (eo): New constraint. (ep): New constraint. * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (rs6000_md_asm_adjust): If prefixed addresses are allowed, change the 'm' and 'o' constraints to 'em' and 'eo' that do not allow prefixed instructions. * doc/md.texi (PowerPC and IBM RS6000 constraints): Document 'em', 'eo', and 'ep' constraints. [gcc/testsuite] 2021-02-01 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com> PR target/98519 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr98519.c: New test. --- gcc/config/rs6000/constraints.md | 19 ++++++++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++- gcc/doc/md.texi | 9 ++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr98519.c | 17 +++++++ 4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr98519.c