Message ID | 20210601143422.25064-2-patrickdepinguin@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce BR2_ENABLE_RUNTIME_DEBUG | expand |
Thomas, All, On 2021-06-01 16:34 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire spake thusly: > From: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com> > > Some packages have optional runtime assertions, extra traces, or other > elements that can help in debugging problems. However, such runtime elements > can negatively influence performance. > > In a test program performing 100K gRPC calls from a client to a local server > and receiving the returned response, we see following execution time: > > - runtime debug enabled: 1065 seconds > - runtime debug disabled: 48 seconds > > This is more than a factor 20 (!) difference. Analysis shows that the > problem mostly stems from libabseil-cpp (a dependency of gRPC) which enables > mutex deadlock analysis when the preprocessor flag 'NDEBUG' is not set, > which adds a 'backtrace()' call on every lock/unlock. Potentially worse, > when libunwind is enabled and linked with the test program, 'backtrace()' is > not provided by glibc but by libunwind itself. > > For production systems, users expect good performance out-of-the-box. In the > example above, the difference is huge and unless explicitly tested and > analyzed, users may not realize that the performance could be much better. > > Address this problem by introducing a new option BR2_ENABLE_RUNTIME_DEBUG, > which can be used by packages or package infrastructures to set the > necessary flags. > > Note that BR2_ENABLE_RUNTIME_DEBUG is orthogonal to BR2_ENABLE_DEBUG: the > former changes runtime behavior, while the latter is only expected to add > debug symbols to the build. Today, the cmake build system does introduce a > runtime impact when BR2_ENABLE_DEBUG is set, but that will be rectified in a > subsequent commit. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com> > Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be> Reviewed-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> No, I am *not* going to bikeshed on the prompt... ;-) Although yes, I can see how it could be a little bit confusing... Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > --- > Config.in | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Config.in b/Config.in > index c65e34bd5e..a008425688 100644 > --- a/Config.in > +++ b/Config.in > @@ -412,6 +412,19 @@ config BR2_DEBUG_3 > endchoice > endif > > +config BR2_ENABLE_RUNTIME_DEBUG > + bool "build packages with runtime debugging info" > + help > + Some packages may have runtime assertions, extra traces, and > + similar runtime elements that can help debugging. However, > + these elements may negatively influence performance so should > + normally not be enabled on production systems. > + > + Enable this option to enable such runtime debugging. > + > + Note: disabling this option is not a guarantee that all > + packages effectively removed these runtime debugging elements. > + > config BR2_STRIP_strip > bool "strip target binaries" > default y > -- > 2.26.3 > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
diff --git a/Config.in b/Config.in index c65e34bd5e..a008425688 100644 --- a/Config.in +++ b/Config.in @@ -412,6 +412,19 @@ config BR2_DEBUG_3 endchoice endif +config BR2_ENABLE_RUNTIME_DEBUG + bool "build packages with runtime debugging info" + help + Some packages may have runtime assertions, extra traces, and + similar runtime elements that can help debugging. However, + these elements may negatively influence performance so should + normally not be enabled on production systems. + + Enable this option to enable such runtime debugging. + + Note: disabling this option is not a guarantee that all + packages effectively removed these runtime debugging elements. + config BR2_STRIP_strip bool "strip target binaries" default y