diff mbox series

[1/4] DEVELOPERS: Fix file order list maintained by me

Message ID 1535963172-6664-1-git-send-email-jagan@amarulasolutions.com
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [1/4] DEVELOPERS: Fix file order list maintained by me | expand

Commit Message

Jagan Teki Sept. 3, 2018, 8:26 a.m. UTC
Files list maintained by me in DEVELOPERS file is not
in proper order, fix it with ascending order.

Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
---
 DEVELOPERS | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Thomas Petazzoni Sept. 5, 2018, 9:46 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello Jagan,

On Mon,  3 Sep 2018 10:26:09 +0200, Jagan Teki wrote:

> -F:	configs/amarula_a64_relic_defconfig

The support for this board is not merged yet. If you send patches that
depend on other patches, you should send them all in a patch series.

But in this case, you should have rather based this patch series on
master or next, and not on your branch that contains some unrelated
work such as the Amarula A64 Relic board support.

Anyway, I've fixed this up, and applied to master. Thanks!

Thomas
Jagan Teki Sept. 6, 2018, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> Hello Jagan,
>
> On Mon,  3 Sep 2018 10:26:09 +0200, Jagan Teki wrote:
>
>> -F:   configs/amarula_a64_relic_defconfig
>
> The support for this board is not merged yet. If you send patches that
> depend on other patches, you should send them all in a patch series.
>
> But in this case, you should have rather based this patch series on
> master or next, and not on your branch that contains some unrelated
> work such as the Amarula A64 Relic board support.

Sorry, I thought this board is mainlined. any further comments on this board?

>
> Anyway, I've fixed this up, and applied to master. Thanks!

Thanks.
Thomas Petazzoni Sept. 6, 2018, 3:51 p.m. UTC | #3
Hello,

On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:18:30 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:

> Sorry, I thought this board is mainlined. any further comments on this board?

Not at this point, it needs to be reviewed, just like the other 260
patches we have in our backlog :-/

Thomas
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/DEVELOPERS b/DEVELOPERS
index 03d9df0..a4c1297 100644
--- a/DEVELOPERS
+++ b/DEVELOPERS
@@ -901,9 +901,6 @@  F:	board/amarula/
 F:	board/asus/
 F:	board/bananapi/
 F:	board/engicam/
-F:	configs/amarula_a64_relic_defconfig
-F:	configs/amarula_vyasa_rk3288_defconfig
-F:	configs/asus_tinker_rk3288_defconfig
 F:	board/friendlyarm/nanopi-a64/
 F:	board/friendlyarm/nanopi-neo2/
 F:	board/olimex/a64-olinuxino/
@@ -912,8 +909,16 @@  F:	board/orangepi/orangepi-prime/
 F:	board/orangepi/orangepi-win/
 F:	board/orangepi/orangepi-zero-plus2/
 F:	board/pine64/
+F:	configs/amarula_a64_relic_defconfig
+F:	configs/amarula_vyasa_rk3288_defconfig
+F:	configs/asus_tinker_rk3288_defconfig
 F:	configs/bananapi_m1_defconfig
 F:	configs/bananapi_m64_defconfig
+F:	configs/engicam_imx6qdl_icore_defconfig
+F:	configs/engicam_imx6qdl_icore_qt5_defconfig
+F:	configs/engicam_imx6qdl_icore_rqs_defconfig
+F:	configs/engicam_imx6ul_geam_defconfig
+F:	configs/engicam_imx6ul_isiot_defconfig
 F:	configs/friendlyarm_nanopi_a64_defconfig
 F:	configs/friendlyarm_nanopi_neo2_defconfig
 F:	configs/olimex_a64_olinuxino_defconfig
@@ -923,11 +928,6 @@  F:	configs/orangepi_win_defconfig
 F:	configs/orangepi_zero_plus2_defconfig
 F:	configs/pine64_defconfig
 F:	configs/pine64_sopine_defconfig
-F:	configs/engicam_imx6qdl_icore_defconfig
-F:	configs/engicam_imx6qdl_icore_qt5_defconfig
-F:	configs/engicam_imx6qdl_icore_rqs_defconfig
-F:	configs/engicam_imx6ul_geam_defconfig
-F:	configs/engicam_imx6ul_isiot_defconfig
 
 N:	James Knight <james.knight@rockwellcollins.com>
 F:	package/atkmm/