diff mbox

[3.5.y.z,extended,stable] Patch "ptrace/x86: Introduce set_task_blockstep() helper" has been added to staging queue

Message ID 1362052747-20682-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Luis Henriques Feb. 28, 2013, 11:59 a.m. UTC 
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    ptrace/x86: Introduce set_task_blockstep() helper

to the linux-3.5.y-queue branch of the 3.5.y.z extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.5.y-queue

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 3.5.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Luis

------

From ab5d33fe729069fe53dcd893d33dd59443e34908 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 17:31:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ptrace/x86: Introduce set_task_blockstep() helper

commit 848e8f5f0ad3169560c516fff6471be65f76e69f upstream.

No functional changes, preparation for the next fix and for uprobes
single-step fixes.

Move the code playing with TIF_BLOCKSTEP/DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF into the
new helper, set_task_blockstep().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/step.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--
1.8.1.2
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
index c346d11..7a51498 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
@@ -157,6 +157,21 @@  static int enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
 	return 1;
 }

+static void set_task_blockstep(struct task_struct *task, bool on)
+{
+	unsigned long debugctl;
+
+	debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
+	if (on) {
+		debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
+		set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
+	} else {
+		debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
+		clear_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
+	}
+	update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
+}
+
 /*
  * Enable single or block step.
  */
@@ -169,19 +184,10 @@  static void enable_step(struct task_struct *child, bool block)
 	 * So no one should try to use debugger block stepping in a program
 	 * that uses user-mode single stepping itself.
 	 */
-	if (enable_single_step(child) && block) {
-		unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
-
-		debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
-		update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
-		set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
-	} else if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) {
-		unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
-
-		debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
-		update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
-		clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
-	}
+	if (enable_single_step(child) && block)
+		set_task_blockstep(child, true);
+	else if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP))
+		set_task_blockstep(child, false);
 }

 void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
@@ -199,13 +205,8 @@  void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
 	/*
 	 * Make sure block stepping (BTF) is disabled.
 	 */
-	if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) {
-		unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
-
-		debugctl &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
-		update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
-		clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
-	}
+	if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP))
+		set_task_blockstep(child, false);

 	/* Always clear TIF_SINGLESTEP... */
 	clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SINGLESTEP);