Message ID | 20220104193811.1506192-1-alex.hung@canonical.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix for rare suspend (s0ix) failures on AMD systems | expand |
Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com> On 1/4/22 12:38 PM, Alex Hung wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956373 > > [Impact] > > A rare (~1%) failure has been reported in the community for a period of time > on Renoir platforms with s0ix. This failure was also corroborated once by > a Cezanne user. > > [Fix] > > In the s0ix entry need retain gfx in the gfxoff state, so skipping setting > gfx cgpg in the S0ix suspend-resume process. > > The fix was cherry-picked from 5.16-rc8. > > [Test] > > This is requested by AMD. > > [Where problems could occur] > > Low risk. This only affects AMD systems that support s0ix. > > Prike Liang (1): > drm/amd/pm: skip setting gfx cgpg in the s0ix suspend-resume > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 7 ++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu12/smu_v12_0.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >
On 4.1.2022 21.38, Alex Hung wrote: > BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956373 > > [Impact] > > A rare (~1%) failure has been reported in the community for a period of time > on Renoir platforms with s0ix. This failure was also corroborated once by > a Cezanne user. > > [Fix] > > In the s0ix entry need retain gfx in the gfxoff state, so skipping setting > gfx cgpg in the S0ix suspend-resume process. > > The fix was cherry-picked from 5.16-rc8. > > [Test] > > This is requested by AMD. > > [Where problems could occur] > > Low risk. This only affects AMD systems that support s0ix. > > Prike Liang (1): > drm/amd/pm: skip setting gfx cgpg in the s0ix suspend-resume > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 7 ++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu12/smu_v12_0.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > applied to oem-5.14, thanks what about jammy?