| Message ID | 20231003035800.2626121-1-judge.packham@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 5779da53136766b1718fc84ffa07af439f9fe82d |
| Delegated to: | Stefan Roese |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] arm: mvebu: x240: Disable SMBIOS | expand |
On 10/3/23 05:57, Chris Packham wrote: > The x240 doesn't make use of EFI or SMBIOS. Recently we started seeing > boot failures such as > > WARNING: SMBIOS table_address overflow 23f60c020 > Failed to write SMBIOS table > initcall failed at event 10/(unknown) (err=-22) > ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### > > The error is because the physical address of the RAM on the AC5X SoC is > above the 32GiB boundary. As we don't need SMBIOS or EFI this can be > safely disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Thanks, Stefan > --- > > configs/x240_defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/configs/x240_defconfig b/configs/x240_defconfig > index 7d2b8603e6f4..0d5a19df25aa 100644 > --- a/configs/x240_defconfig > +++ b/configs/x240_defconfig > @@ -84,3 +84,4 @@ CONFIG_USB_ETHER_MCS7830=y > CONFIG_USB_ETHER_RTL8152=y > CONFIG_USB_ETHER_SMSC95XX=y > # CONFIG_FAT_WRITE is not set > +# CONFIG_SMBIOS is not set Viele Grüße, Stefan Roese
On 10/5/23 09:54, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 10/3/23 05:57, Chris Packham wrote: >> The x240 doesn't make use of EFI or SMBIOS. Recently we started seeing >> boot failures such as >> >> WARNING: SMBIOS table_address overflow 23f60c020 >> Failed to write SMBIOS table >> initcall failed at event 10/(unknown) (err=-22) >> ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### >> >> The error is because the physical address of the RAM on the AC5X SoC is >> above the 32GiB boundary. As we don't need SMBIOS or EFI this can be >> safely disabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Applied to u-boot-marvell/master Thanks, Stefan > Thanks, > Stefan > >> --- >> >> configs/x240_defconfig | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/configs/x240_defconfig b/configs/x240_defconfig >> index 7d2b8603e6f4..0d5a19df25aa 100644 >> --- a/configs/x240_defconfig >> +++ b/configs/x240_defconfig >> @@ -84,3 +84,4 @@ CONFIG_USB_ETHER_MCS7830=y >> CONFIG_USB_ETHER_RTL8152=y >> CONFIG_USB_ETHER_SMSC95XX=y >> # CONFIG_FAT_WRITE is not set >> +# CONFIG_SMBIOS is not set > > Viele Grüße, > Stefan Roese > Viele Grüße, Stefan Roese
diff --git a/configs/x240_defconfig b/configs/x240_defconfig index 7d2b8603e6f4..0d5a19df25aa 100644 --- a/configs/x240_defconfig +++ b/configs/x240_defconfig @@ -84,3 +84,4 @@ CONFIG_USB_ETHER_MCS7830=y CONFIG_USB_ETHER_RTL8152=y CONFIG_USB_ETHER_SMSC95XX=y # CONFIG_FAT_WRITE is not set +# CONFIG_SMBIOS is not set
The x240 doesn't make use of EFI or SMBIOS. Recently we started seeing boot failures such as WARNING: SMBIOS table_address overflow 23f60c020 Failed to write SMBIOS table initcall failed at event 10/(unknown) (err=-22) ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ### The error is because the physical address of the RAM on the AC5X SoC is above the 32GiB boundary. As we don't need SMBIOS or EFI this can be safely disabled. Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> --- configs/x240_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)