diff mbox series

[v3,1/2] mtd: cfi_flash: use cfi_flash_num_flash_banks only when supported

Message ID 20210916155040.v3.1.I81b4f1edfe925b001299e3b7ba0cf602d9268d59@changeid
State Superseded
Delegated to: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
Headers show
Series mtd: spi: nor: force mtd name to "nor%d" | expand

Commit Message

Patrick Delaunay Sept. 16, 2021, 2:01 p.m. UTC
When CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT is activated,
CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is replaced by cfi_flash_num_flash_banks,
but this variable is defined in drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c, which is
compiled only when CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER is activated, in U-Boot
or in SPL when CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT is activated.

This patch deactivates this feature CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
when flash cfi driver is not activated to avoid compilation issue in
the next patch, when CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is used in spi_nor_scan().

Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
---
see error in
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-stm/-/pipelines/9138

drivers/mtd/spi/spi-nor-core.o: in function `spi_nor_scan':
drivers/mtd/spi/spi-nor-core.c:3672:
    undefined reference to `cfi_flash_num_flash_banks'

compilation issue for the boards:
- j721e_hs_evm_r5
- j721e_evm_r5j
- j721e_hs_evm_a72
- j721e_evm_a72
- sagem_f@st1704_ram

Changes in v3:
- NEW: solve compilation issue when CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is used

 include/mtd/cfi_flash.h | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Marek Vasut Sept. 16, 2021, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/16/21 4:01 PM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> When CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT is activated,
> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is replaced by cfi_flash_num_flash_banks,
> but this variable is defined in drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c, which is
> compiled only when CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER is activated, in U-Boot
> or in SPL when CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT is activated.
> 
> This patch deactivates this feature CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
> when flash cfi driver is not activated to avoid compilation issue in
> the next patch, when CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is used in spi_nor_scan().

Maybe just migrate this config option to Kconfig and let Kconfig handle 
the macro magic ?
Patrick Delaunay Sept. 17, 2021, 10:55 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Marek,

 > Marek VasutSept. 16, 2021, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #1

 > On 9/16/21 4:01 PM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:

 >> When CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT is activated,
 >> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is replaced by cfi_flash_num_flash_banks,
 >> but this variable is defined in drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c, which is
 >> compiled only when CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER is activated, in U-Boot
 >> or in SPL when CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT is activated.
 >>
 >> This patch deactivates this feature CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
 >> when flash cfi driver is not activated to avoid compilation issue in
 >> the next patch, when CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is used in 
spi_nor_scan().

 > Maybe just migrate this config option to Kconfig and let Kconfig handle
 > the macro magic ?


Sorry for the format  of my answer (it is just copy paste from archive)

because I don't received the U-Boot mails on my @foss.st.com mailbo

since yesterday.


I think about migration but is difficult to don't break the existing 
behaviour in kconfig

CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS and CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT are 
define as 'int'

but can be absent => 2 new config CONFIG_USE need to be added

CONFIG_USE_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS

CONFIG_USE_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT


and I don't fully understood the mix between the 2 options and 
CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS

in some part of code I think CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS should be 
replaced by CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS

to avoid to define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS = 
cfi_flash_num_flash_banks (as it is not possible in Kconfig)


=> too huge task just to solve compilation issues.


and I also think to use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MTD_SUPPORT)

but it not possible because today

- CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT exist

- CONFIG_MTD_SUPPORT don't exit ( test on $(mtd-y) in Makefile)


=> the creation of this config is a huge task just to solve compilation 
issue.


Patrick
Marek Vasut Sept. 17, 2021, 1:36 p.m. UTC | #3
On 9/17/21 12:55 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
>  > Marek VasutSept. 16, 2021, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #1
> 
>  > On 9/16/21 4:01 PM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> 
>  >> When CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT is activated,
>  >> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is replaced by cfi_flash_num_flash_banks,
>  >> but this variable is defined in drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c, which is
>  >> compiled only when CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER is activated, in U-Boot
>  >> or in SPL when CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT is activated.
>  >>
>  >> This patch deactivates this feature CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
>  >> when flash cfi driver is not activated to avoid compilation issue in
>  >> the next patch, when CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is used in 
> spi_nor_scan().
> 
>  > Maybe just migrate this config option to Kconfig and let Kconfig handle
>  > the macro magic ?
> 
> 
> Sorry for the format  of my answer (it is just copy paste from archive)
> 
> because I don't received the U-Boot mails on my @foss.st.com mailbo
> 
> since yesterday.
> 
> 
> I think about migration but is difficult to don't break the existing 
> behaviour in kconfig
> 
> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS and CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT are 
> define as 'int'
> 
> but can be absent => 2 new config CONFIG_USE need to be added
> 
> CONFIG_USE_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
> 
> CONFIG_USE_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
> 
> 
> and I don't fully understood the mix between the 2 options and 
> CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
> 
> in some part of code I think CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS should be 
> replaced by CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
> 
> to avoid to define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS = 
> cfi_flash_num_flash_banks (as it is not possible in Kconfig)
> 
> 
> => too huge task just to solve compilation issues.
> 
> 
> and I also think to use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MTD_SUPPORT)
> 
> but it not possible because today
> 
> - CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT exist
> 
> - CONFIG_MTD_SUPPORT don't exit ( test on $(mtd-y) in Makefile)
> 
> 
> => the creation of this config is a huge task just to solve compilation 
> issue.

All right, well, ew.

Can you send a subsequent patchset _after_ this one to fix this flash 
banks mess ?
Patrick Delaunay Sept. 21, 2021, 12:38 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi,

On 9/17/21 3:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 9/17/21 12:55 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>>  > Marek VasutSept. 16, 2021, 5:24 p.m. UTC | #1
>>
>>  > On 9/16/21 4:01 PM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>>
>>  >> When CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT is activated,
>>  >> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is replaced by cfi_flash_num_flash_banks,
>>  >> but this variable is defined in drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c, which is
>>  >> compiled only when CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER is activated, in U-Boot
>>  >> or in SPL when CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT is activated.
>>  >>
>>  >> This patch deactivates this feature 
>> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
>>  >> when flash cfi driver is not activated to avoid compilation issue in
>>  >> the next patch, when CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is used in 
>> spi_nor_scan().
>>
>>  > Maybe just migrate this config option to Kconfig and let Kconfig 
>> handle
>>  > the macro magic ?
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the format  of my answer (it is just copy paste from archive)
>>
>> because I don't received the U-Boot mails on my @foss.st.com mailbo
>>
>> since yesterday.
>>
>>
>> I think about migration but is difficult to don't break the existing 
>> behaviour in kconfig
>>
>> CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS and CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT are 
>> define as 'int'
>>
>> but can be absent => 2 new config CONFIG_USE need to be added
>>
>> CONFIG_USE_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
>>
>> CONFIG_USE_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
>>
>>
>> and I don't fully understood the mix between the 2 options and 
>> CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
>>
>> in some part of code I think CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS should be 
>> replaced by CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
>>
>> to avoid to define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS = 
>> cfi_flash_num_flash_banks (as it is not possible in Kconfig)
>>
>>
>> => too huge task just to solve compilation issues.
>>
>>
>> and I also think to use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MTD_SUPPORT)
>>
>> but it not possible because today
>>
>> - CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT exist
>>
>> - CONFIG_MTD_SUPPORT don't exit ( test on $(mtd-y) in Makefile)
>>
>>
>> => the creation of this config is a huge task just to solve 
>> compilation issue.
>
> All right, well, ew.
>
> Can you send a subsequent patchset _after_ this one to fix this flash 
> banks mess ?


I can try,

I will add it in my TODO list.


Patrick
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/mtd/cfi_flash.h b/include/mtd/cfi_flash.h
index 4963c89642..a1af6fc200 100644
--- a/include/mtd/cfi_flash.h
+++ b/include/mtd/cfi_flash.h
@@ -157,11 +157,17 @@  struct cfi_pri_hdr {
  * Use CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT if defined
  */
 #if defined(CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT)
-#define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS	(cfi_flash_num_flash_banks)
 #define CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS	CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
+/* map to cfi_flash_num_flash_banks only when supported */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER) && \
+    (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT))
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS	(cfi_flash_num_flash_banks)
 /* board code can update this variable before CFI detection */
 extern int cfi_flash_num_flash_banks;
 #else
+#define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS	CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS_DETECT
+#endif
+#else
 #define CFI_MAX_FLASH_BANKS	CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS
 #endif