diff mbox series

[v2,2/2] arm: stm32mp: activate data cache on DDR in SPL

Message ID 20200403105644.v2.2.Ib571c64a8c50fcbe386e728e38bbd320427e4efb@changeid
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Patrice Chotard
Headers show
Series arm: stm32mp1: activate data cache in SPL and before relocation | expand

Commit Message

Patrick DELAUNAY April 3, 2020, 9:25 a.m. UTC
Activate cache on DDR to improves the accesses to DDR used by SPL:
- CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR
- CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START

Cache is configured only when DDR is fully initialized,
to avoid speculative access and issue in get_ram_size().
Data cache is deactivated at the end of SPL, to flush the data cache
and the TLB.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
---

Changes in v2:
- new

 arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

Comments

Marek Vasut April 3, 2020, 9:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On 4/3/20 11:25 AM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> Activate cache on DDR to improves the accesses to DDR used by SPL:
> - CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR
> - CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START
> 
> Cache is configured only when DDR is fully initialized,
> to avoid speculative access and issue in get_ram_size().
> Data cache is deactivated at the end of SPL, to flush the data cache
> and the TLB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - new
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c
> index 9cd7b418a4..279121af75 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <common.h>
> +#include <cpu_func.h>
>  #include <dm.h>
>  #include <hang.h>
>  #include <spl.h>
> @@ -117,4 +118,24 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
>  		printf("DRAM init failed: %d\n", ret);
>  		hang();
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * activate cache on DDR only when DDR is fully initialized
> +	 * to avoid speculative access and issue in get_ram_size()
> +	 */
> +	if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF))
> +		mmu_set_region_dcache_behaviour(STM32_DDR_BASE, STM32_DDR_SIZE,
> +						DCACHE_DEFAULT_OPTION);
> +}
> +
> +void spl_board_prepare_for_boot(void)
> +{
> +	dcache_disable();
> +	debug("SPL bye\n");
> +}
> +
> +void spl_board_prepare_for_boot_linux(void)
> +{
> +	dcache_disable();
> +	debug("SPL bye\n");

Is the debug() statement really needed ? I think the common SPL code
already has some.
Patrick DELAUNAY April 9, 2020, 6:10 p.m. UTC | #2
Dear Marek,

> From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Sent: vendredi 3 avril 2020 23:33
> 
> On 4/3/20 11:25 AM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> > Activate cache on DDR to improves the accesses to DDR used by SPL:
> > - CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR
> > - CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START
> >
> > Cache is configured only when DDR is fully initialized, to avoid
> > speculative access and issue in get_ram_size().
> > Data cache is deactivated at the end of SPL, to flush the data cache
> > and the TLB.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - new
> >

[...]

> > +void spl_board_prepare_for_boot(void) {
> > +	dcache_disable();
> > +	debug("SPL bye\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > +void spl_board_prepare_for_boot_linux(void)
> > +{
> > +	dcache_disable();
> > +	debug("SPL bye\n");
> 
> Is the debug() statement really needed ? I think the common SPL code already
> has some.

Not needed, I will drop them in V3.

Patrick
Marek Vasut April 10, 2020, 8:15 a.m. UTC | #3
On 4/9/20 8:10 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Dear Marek,
> 
>> From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>> Sent: vendredi 3 avril 2020 23:33
>>
>> On 4/3/20 11:25 AM, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>>> Activate cache on DDR to improves the accesses to DDR used by SPL:
>>> - CONFIG_SPL_BSS_START_ADDR
>>> - CONFIG_SYS_SPL_MALLOC_START
>>>
>>> Cache is configured only when DDR is fully initialized, to avoid
>>> speculative access and issue in get_ram_size().
>>> Data cache is deactivated at the end of SPL, to flush the data cache
>>> and the TLB.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@st.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - new
>>>
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +void spl_board_prepare_for_boot(void) {
>>> +	dcache_disable();
>>> +	debug("SPL bye\n");
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void spl_board_prepare_for_boot_linux(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	dcache_disable();
>>> +	debug("SPL bye\n");
>>
>> Is the debug() statement really needed ? I think the common SPL code already
>> has some.
> 
> Not needed, I will drop them in V3.

Thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c
index 9cd7b418a4..279121af75 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/spl.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ 
  */
 
 #include <common.h>
+#include <cpu_func.h>
 #include <dm.h>
 #include <hang.h>
 #include <spl.h>
@@ -117,4 +118,24 @@  void board_init_f(ulong dummy)
 		printf("DRAM init failed: %d\n", ret);
 		hang();
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * activate cache on DDR only when DDR is fully initialized
+	 * to avoid speculative access and issue in get_ram_size()
+	 */
+	if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF))
+		mmu_set_region_dcache_behaviour(STM32_DDR_BASE, STM32_DDR_SIZE,
+						DCACHE_DEFAULT_OPTION);
+}
+
+void spl_board_prepare_for_boot(void)
+{
+	dcache_disable();
+	debug("SPL bye\n");
+}
+
+void spl_board_prepare_for_boot_linux(void)
+{
+	dcache_disable();
+	debug("SPL bye\n");
 }