diff mbox series

[U-Boot] rpi: add Compute Module 3+

Message ID 20190130141724.22574-1-jsg@jsg.id.au
State Superseded
Delegated to: Alexander Graf
Headers show
Series [U-Boot] rpi: add Compute Module 3+ | expand

Commit Message

Jonathan Gray Jan. 30, 2019, 2:17 p.m. UTC
Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ to list of models, the revision code
is 0x10 according to the list on raspberrypi.org.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
---
 board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Alexander Graf Jan. 30, 2019, 3:13 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jonathan,

On 30.01.19 15:17, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ to list of models, the revision code
> is 0x10 according to the list on raspberrypi.org.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
> ---
>  board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> index 153a1fdcb7..c118250740 100644
> --- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> +++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
>  		DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb",
>  		false,
>  	},
> +	[0x10] = {
> +		"Compute Module 3+",
> +		DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-cm3-plus.dtb",

Is the dtb name already committed to? I haven't seen patches on the rpi
kernel ML.


Alex

> +		false,
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_old_scheme[] = {
>
Jonathan Gray Jan. 30, 2019, 9:38 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 30.01.19 15:17, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ to list of models, the revision code
> > is 0x10 according to the list on raspberrypi.org.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
> > ---
> >  board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> > index 153a1fdcb7..c118250740 100644
> > --- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> > +++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> > @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
> >  		DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb",
> >  		false,
> >  	},
> > +	[0x10] = {
> > +		"Compute Module 3+",
> > +		DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-cm3-plus.dtb",
> 
> Is the dtb name already committed to? I haven't seen patches on the rpi
> kernel ML.

I didn't see an existing name in various linux trees.

There is currently no new dtb provided with the firmware either, though
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raspberrypi/documentation/master/hardware/computemodule/datasheets/rpi_DATA_CM3plus_1p0.pdf
states

"CM3+ modules require a software/firmware image dated November 2018 or
newer to function correctly."

So the firmware likely patches bcm2710-rpi-cm3.dtb before passing it on.
Alexander Graf Jan. 30, 2019, 9:56 p.m. UTC | #3
> Am 30.01.2019 um 22:38 schrieb Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>:
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>> 
>>> On 30.01.19 15:17, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>> Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ to list of models, the revision code
>>> is 0x10 according to the list on raspberrypi.org.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
>>> ---
>>> board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
>>> index 153a1fdcb7..c118250740 100644
>>> --- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
>>> +++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
>>> @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
>>>        DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb",
>>>        false,
>>>    },
>>> +    [0x10] = {
>>> +        "Compute Module 3+",
>>> +        DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-cm3-plus.dtb",
>> 
>> Is the dtb name already committed to? I haven't seen patches on the rpi
>> kernel ML.
> 
> I didn't see an existing name in various linux trees.
> 
> There is currently no new dtb provided with the firmware either, though
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raspberrypi/documentation/master/hardware/computemodule/datasheets/rpi_DATA_CM3plus_1p0.pdf
> states
> 
> "CM3+ modules require a software/firmware image dated November 2018 or
> newer to function correctly."
> 
> So the firmware likely patches bcm2710-rpi-cm3.dtb before passing it on.

Or maybe it's identical to the CM3? It's supposed to be a drop in replacement after all - and the other differences (wifi chip, usb hub) of the 3+ should not apply to a CM.

So I guess either you send a patch to Linux that adds the cm3plus and only changes the compatible/model properties over cm3 or we make the dtb name in this patch the cm3 one.

Alex
Jonathan Gray Jan. 30, 2019, 10:13 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:56:37PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> > Am 30.01.2019 um 22:38 schrieb Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>:
> > 
> >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:13:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Hi Jonathan,
> >> 
> >>> On 30.01.19 15:17, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >>> Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 3+ to list of models, the revision code
> >>> is 0x10 according to the list on raspberrypi.org.
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Gray <jsg@jsg.id.au>
> >>> ---
> >>> board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 5 +++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> >>> index 153a1fdcb7..c118250740 100644
> >>> --- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> >>> +++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
> >>> @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
> >>>        DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb",
> >>>        false,
> >>>    },
> >>> +    [0x10] = {
> >>> +        "Compute Module 3+",
> >>> +        DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-cm3-plus.dtb",
> >> 
> >> Is the dtb name already committed to? I haven't seen patches on the rpi
> >> kernel ML.
> > 
> > I didn't see an existing name in various linux trees.
> > 
> > There is currently no new dtb provided with the firmware either, though
> > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raspberrypi/documentation/master/hardware/computemodule/datasheets/rpi_DATA_CM3plus_1p0.pdf
> > states
> > 
> > "CM3+ modules require a software/firmware image dated November 2018 or
> > newer to function correctly."
> > 
> > So the firmware likely patches bcm2710-rpi-cm3.dtb before passing it on.
> 
> Or maybe it's identical to the CM3? It's supposed to be a drop in replacement after all - and the other differences (wifi chip, usb hub) of the 3+ should not apply to a CM.
> 
> So I guess either you send a patch to Linux that adds the cm3plus and only changes the compatible/model properties over cm3 or we make the dtb name in this patch the cm3 one.
> 
> Alex

Ok, I'll send a v2 with "bcm2837-rpi-cm3.dtb".
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
index 153a1fdcb7..c118250740 100644
--- a/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
+++ b/board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c
@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@  static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_new_scheme[] = {
 		DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb",
 		false,
 	},
+	[0x10] = {
+		"Compute Module 3+",
+		DTB_DIR "bcm2837-rpi-cm3-plus.dtb",
+		false,
+	},
 };
 
 static const struct rpi_model rpi_models_old_scheme[] = {