Message ID | 20181020213556.66dedc4d@crub |
---|---|
State | Deferred |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
Series | [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-staging | expand |
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 09:35:56PM +0200, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Hi Tom, > > please pull some synxi PWM driver bugfixes: > > The following changes since commit e3beca3a2fe172ca707a0e70310f9f7ebd3b3f0f: > > Merge tag 'signed-efi-2018.11' of git://github.com/agraf/u-boot (2018-10-17 07:20:52 -0400) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-staging.git agust@denx.de > > for you to fetch changes up to a1f95bf1a87c5e4f9fe37b02bc1e34cccd3893b5: > > pwm: sunxi: choose best prescaler to improve PWM resolution (2018-10-18 23:05:00 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Vasily Khoruzhick (3): > pwm: sunxi: fix off-by-one that prevented PWM to use prescaler bypass > pwm: sunxi: use new prescaler when configuring PWM > pwm: sunxi: choose best prescaler to improve PWM resolution > > drivers/pwm/sunxi_pwm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) These all look like things that should go via the sunxi tree, and Jagan is fairly active. I'm curious, why did you pick these up presently? Thanks!
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:43:48 -0400 Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote: ... > These all look like things that should go via the sunxi tree, and Jagan > is fairly active. I'm curious, why did you pick these up presently? I got this series on Tuesday and then also got Acked-by and Tested-by stating that is fixes LCD backlight issues on pinebook. Jagan didn't respond yet, so I intervened. I'm fine if Jagan takes them via sunxi tree. Thanks, Anatolij
On 21/10/18 1:50 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:43:48 -0400 > Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote: > ... >> These all look like things that should go via the sunxi tree, and Jagan >> is fairly active. I'm curious, why did you pick these up presently? > > I got this series on Tuesday and then also got Acked-by and Tested-by > stating that is fixes LCD backlight issues on pinebook. Jagan didn't > respond yet, so I intervened. I'm fine if Jagan takes them via sunxi tree. Not good, patches in ML in 5 days back. better wait or ping on the series. I do understand these fixes will go and I saw them as well. Waiting for some issues to fix so all will pack all once.
Hi Jagan, On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:56:14 +0530 Jagan Teki jagan@openedev.com wrote: >On 21/10/18 1:50 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:43:48 -0400 >> Tom Rini trini@konsulko.com wrote: >> ... >>> These all look like things that should go via the sunxi tree, and Jagan >>> is fairly active. I'm curious, why did you pick these up presently? >> >> I got this series on Tuesday and then also got Acked-by and Tested-by >> stating that is fixes LCD backlight issues on pinebook. Jagan didn't >> respond yet, so I intervened. I'm fine if Jagan takes them via sunxi tree. > >Not good, patches in ML in 5 days back. better wait or ping on the >series. I do understand these fixes will go and I saw them as well. >Waiting for some issues to fix so all will pack all once. I think patches fixing errors should be applied as soon as possible, especially when these patches were tested by someone and when it is confirmed that these fix real issues. I've lost more than tree days recently debugging issues and it turned out that the patches for issues I was faced were already submitted to the list, but nobody cared to merge them. Thanks, Anatolij