Message ID | 1496227840-19007-6-git-send-email-kever.yang@rock-chips.com |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Philipp Tomsich |
Headers | show |
Now that there are no remaining cases where (spl_boot0 == false), we can drop the spl_boot0 field from struct spl_info and also remove the if-check (leaving only the code-path for true in place). There should be no need to keep the legacy code-path around, as GIT will always remember them anyway. Regards, Philipp. > On 31 May 2017, at 12:50, Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > Enable the spl_boot0 in SPL and use the pre-padding TAG memory, > the mkimage do not need to pad it but only need to replace the value > with correct TAG value. > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> > --- > > tools/rkcommon.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/rkcommon.c b/tools/rkcommon.c > index 836a5a5..b58dfae 100644 > --- a/tools/rkcommon.c > +++ b/tools/rkcommon.c > @@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ struct spl_info { > }; > > static struct spl_info spl_infos[] = { > - { "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000, false, false }, > - { "rk3188", "RK31", 0x8000 - 0x800, true, false }, > - { "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000, false, false }, > - { "rk3328", "RK32", 0x8000 - 0x1000, false, false }, > + { "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000, false, true }, > + { "rk3188", "RK31", 0x8000 - 0x800, true, true }, > + { "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000, false, true }, > + { "rk3328", "RK32", 0x8000 - 0x1000, false, true }, > { "rk3399", "RK33", 0x20000, false, true }, > }; > > -- > 1.9.1 >
Hi Philipp: 2017-05-31 18:58 GMT+08:00 Dr. Philipp Tomsich < philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>: > Now that there are no remaining cases where (spl_boot0 == false), we can > drop the spl_boot0 field from struct spl_info and also remove the if-check > (leaving only the code-path for true in place). > > I think we still have one case: use mkimage to pack ddr.bin from rockchip as spl.bin. > There should be no need to keep the legacy code-path around, as GIT will > always remember them anyway. > > Regards, > Philipp. > > > On 31 May 2017, at 12:50, Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > > > Enable the spl_boot0 in SPL and use the pre-padding TAG memory, > > the mkimage do not need to pad it but only need to replace the value > > with correct TAG value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> > > --- > > > > tools/rkcommon.c | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/rkcommon.c b/tools/rkcommon.c > > index 836a5a5..b58dfae 100644 > > --- a/tools/rkcommon.c > > +++ b/tools/rkcommon.c > > @@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ struct spl_info { > > }; > > > > static struct spl_info spl_infos[] = { > > - { "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000, false, false }, > > - { "rk3188", "RK31", 0x8000 - 0x800, true, false }, > > - { "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000, false, false }, > > - { "rk3328", "RK32", 0x8000 - 0x1000, false, false }, > > + { "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000, false, true }, > > + { "rk3188", "RK31", 0x8000 - 0x800, true, true }, > > + { "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000, false, true }, > > + { "rk3328", "RK32", 0x8000 - 0x1000, false, true }, > > { "rk3399", "RK33", 0x20000, false, true }, > > }; > > > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot >
> On 01 Jun 2017, at 03:11, Andy Yan <andyshrk@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Philipp: > > 2017-05-31 18:58 GMT+08:00 Dr. Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>: > Now that there are no remaining cases where (spl_boot0 == false), we can > drop the spl_boot0 field from struct spl_info and also remove the if-check > (leaving only the code-path for true in place). > > > > I think we still have one case: use mkimage to pack ddr.bin from rockchip as spl.bin. Excellent point! I completely missed that use-case. However, then we’d need to implement support (an additional commandline flag?) for communicating this into mkimage: with the current state of the code, the new code path (i.e. assuming its a pre-padded image) will be always be taken and ddr.bin can’t be processed. The alternative would be to clearly document that a ddr.bin needs to be prepadded and then pad the ddr.bin manually before passing it to mkimage. I have no preference either way, but would recommend/request that if we leave the code-path in, then there should be a way to invoke it. Best regards, Philipp.
Philipp and Andy, I will remove the "spl_boot0 == false" case in next version. Rockchip ddr.bin is always with pre-paded TAG. Thanks, - Kever On 06/01/2017 03:41 PM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote: >> On 01 Jun 2017, at 03:11, Andy Yan <andyshrk@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Philipp: >> >> 2017-05-31 18:58 GMT+08:00 Dr. Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>: >> Now that there are no remaining cases where (spl_boot0 == false), we can >> drop the spl_boot0 field from struct spl_info and also remove the if-check >> (leaving only the code-path for true in place). >> >> >> >> I think we still have one case: use mkimage to pack ddr.bin from rockchip as spl.bin. > Excellent point! I completely missed that use-case. > > However, then we’d need to implement support (an additional commandline flag?) for > communicating this into mkimage: with the current state of the code, the new code path > (i.e. assuming its a pre-padded image) will be always be taken and ddr.bin can’t be processed. > > The alternative would be to clearly document that a ddr.bin needs to be prepadded and then > pad the ddr.bin manually before passing it to mkimage. > > I have no preference either way, but would recommend/request that if we leave the code-path > in, then there should be a way to invoke it. > > Best regards, > Philipp. > >
diff --git a/tools/rkcommon.c b/tools/rkcommon.c index 836a5a5..b58dfae 100644 --- a/tools/rkcommon.c +++ b/tools/rkcommon.c @@ -68,10 +68,10 @@ struct spl_info { }; static struct spl_info spl_infos[] = { - { "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000, false, false }, - { "rk3188", "RK31", 0x8000 - 0x800, true, false }, - { "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000, false, false }, - { "rk3328", "RK32", 0x8000 - 0x1000, false, false }, + { "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000, false, true }, + { "rk3188", "RK31", 0x8000 - 0x800, true, true }, + { "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000, false, true }, + { "rk3328", "RK32", 0x8000 - 0x1000, false, true }, { "rk3399", "RK33", 0x20000, false, true }, };
Enable the spl_boot0 in SPL and use the pre-padding TAG memory, the mkimage do not need to pad it but only need to replace the value with correct TAG value. Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> --- tools/rkcommon.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)