Message ID | 1484926338-27973-1-git-send-email-vinitha.pillai@nxp.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 9b6639fa85bddd90df4c371f25a89c791a6ee6ef |
Delegated to: | York Sun |
Headers | show |
"Secure boot" is a two-word phrase, not one word. On 01/20/2017 01:35 AM, Vinitha Pillai-B57223 wrote: > From: Vinitha Pillai <vinitha.pillai@nxp.com> > > Raw uboot image is used in place of FIT image in secure boot. > The maximum allocated size of raw u-boot bin is 1MB in memory map. > Hence , CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN has been modified to 1 MB. > The bootscript (BS_ADDR) and its header (BS_HDR_ADDR) offset on MMC have also been modified to accommodate the increase in uboot size. Please wrap back at or before 70 characters. Avoid putting extra white space in the message. > > Signed-off-by: Vinitha Pillai-B57223 <vinitha.pillai@nxp.com> Sumit, This change seems harmless. However I don't have the images setup for testing. Please review this patch as the secure boot maintainer. York
> -----Original Message----- > From: york sun > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 10:55 PM > To: Vini Pillai <vinitha.pillai@nxp.com>; Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ruchika Gupta <ruchika.gupta@nxp.com>; > Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] LS1021ATWR: Modify u-boot size for sd secureboot > > "Secure boot" is a two-word phrase, not one word. > > On 01/20/2017 01:35 AM, Vinitha Pillai-B57223 wrote: > > From: Vinitha Pillai <vinitha.pillai@nxp.com> > > > > Raw uboot image is used in place of FIT image in secure boot. > > The maximum allocated size of raw u-boot bin is 1MB in memory map. > > Hence , CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN has been modified to 1 MB. > > The bootscript (BS_ADDR) and its header (BS_HDR_ADDR) offset on MMC > have also been modified to accommodate the increase in uboot size. > > Please wrap back at or before 70 characters. Avoid putting extra white space in > the message. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinitha Pillai-B57223 <vinitha.pillai@nxp.com> > > Sumit, > > This change seems harmless. However I don't have the images setup for > testing. Please review this patch as the secure boot maintainer. > > York Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@nxp.com> Vinitha, Please incorporate York comments. Sumit
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h index 4525287..0ef7315 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ /* For SD boot address and size are assigned in terms of sector * offset and no. of sectors respectively. */ -#define CONFIG_BS_HDR_ADDR_DEVICE 0x00000800 -#define CONFIG_BS_ADDR_DEVICE 0x00000840 +#define CONFIG_BS_HDR_ADDR_DEVICE 0x00000900 +#define CONFIG_BS_ADDR_DEVICE 0x00000940 #define CONFIG_BS_HDR_SIZE 0x00000010 #define CONFIG_BS_SIZE 0x00000008 #else diff --git a/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h b/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h index b48cd00..178239f 100644 --- a/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h +++ b/include/configs/ls1021atwr.h @@ -134,9 +134,9 @@ * size increases then increase this size in case of secure boot as * it uses raw u-boot image instead of fit image. */ -#define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN (0x80000 + CONFIG_U_BOOT_HDR_SIZE) +#define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN (0x100000 + CONFIG_U_BOOT_HDR_SIZE) #else -#define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN 0x80000 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN 0x100000 #endif /* ifdef CONFIG_U_BOOT_HDR_SIZE */ #endif