diff mbox

[U-Boot] imx: vf610 add function get_cpu_rev

Message ID 1441071615-21903-1-git-send-email-Peng.Fan@freescale.com
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Stefano Babic
Headers show

Commit Message

Peng Fan Sept. 1, 2015, 1:40 a.m. UTC
Since we need to support runtime check for different drivers,
we need to add get_cpu_rev for vf610.

This patch only introduce a empty implementation to avoid build errors,
later more stuff can be added if need to check vf610 cpu types.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
---
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

Comments

Peng Fan Sept. 1, 2015, 6:30 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Stefano,

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:28:40AM +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
>Hi Peng,
>
>On 01/09/2015 03:40, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Since we need to support runtime check for different drivers,
>> we need to add get_cpu_rev for vf610.
>> 
>> This patch only introduce a empty implementation to avoid build errors,
>> later more stuff can be added if need to check vf610 cpu types.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
>> index 05c401d..bd948cb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
>> @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac)
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Empty function
>> + * Several drivers use runtime check, which needs get_cpu_rev.
>> + * If later we need to do runtime check for vf610, we can add
>> + * more stuff here.
>> + */
>> +u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
>>  static char *get_reset_cause(void)
>>  {
>> 
>
>If there is really no way to get the cpu revision from the SOC, I
>suggest we use the same approach of MXC_CPU_MX6SOLO with a "dummy" cpu.
>Something like :
>
>#define MXC_CPU_VF610           0xF6 /* dummy CPU */
>
>"F6" from vF610, of course, instead of returning 0.

I not have vf610 board in hand and need to check with others about this.
Not sure when I can get the result. So now for quick fix, using your way with
your Suggested-by. Later, if I can get the results, can use another
patch to fix the cpu type, because build errors should be at high
priority to be fixed. What do you think?

Regards,
Peng.

>
>Best regards,
>Stefano Babic
>
>-- 
>=====================================================================
>DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
>HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
>Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic@denx.de
>=====================================================================
Stefano Babic Sept. 1, 2015, 7:28 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Peng,

On 01/09/2015 03:40, Peng Fan wrote:
> Since we need to support runtime check for different drivers,
> we need to add get_cpu_rev for vf610.
> 
> This patch only introduce a empty implementation to avoid build errors,
> later more stuff can be added if need to check vf610 cpu types.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
> index 05c401d..bd948cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * Empty function
> + * Several drivers use runtime check, which needs get_cpu_rev.
> + * If later we need to do runtime check for vf610, we can add
> + * more stuff here.
> + */
> +u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
>  static char *get_reset_cause(void)
>  {
> 

If there is really no way to get the cpu revision from the SOC, I
suggest we use the same approach of MXC_CPU_MX6SOLO with a "dummy" cpu.
Something like :

#define MXC_CPU_VF610           0xF6 /* dummy CPU */

"F6" from vF610, of course, instead of returning 0.

Best regards,
Stefano Babic
Stefano Babic Sept. 1, 2015, 8:05 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Peng,

On 01/09/2015 08:30, Peng Fan wrote:

> 
> I not have vf610 board in hand and need to check with others about this.

ok

> Not sure when I can get the result. So now for quick fix, using your way with
> your Suggested-by. Later, if I can get the results, can use another
> patch to fix the cpu type, because build errors should be at high
> priority to be fixed. What do you think?

Agree - this is the best we can currently do.

Regards,
Stefano Babic
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
index 05c401d..bd948cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/vf610/generic.c
@@ -266,6 +266,17 @@  void imx_get_mac_from_fuse(int dev_id, unsigned char *mac)
 }
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Empty function
+ * Several drivers use runtime check, which needs get_cpu_rev.
+ * If later we need to do runtime check for vf610, we can add
+ * more stuff here.
+ */
+u32 get_cpu_rev(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
 static char *get_reset_cause(void)
 {