| Message ID | 1436954789-9825-1-git-send-email-judge.packham@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Simon Glass |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> wrote: > To make it easier to use patman on other projects add a distutils style > installer. Now patman can be installed with > > cd u-boot/tools/patman && python setup.py install > > There are also the usual distutils options for creating source/binary > distributions of patman. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> > --- > I've been playing with using patman for Linux development and it > occurred to me that patman should really be something that lives on my > default $PATH. > > It's simple enough to create a distutils configuration that makes this a > reality. > > One thing that would make sense for this is to make patman a python > package to avoid polluting site-packages with generic names like 'test' > and 'command'. With a little restructuring it would probably be possible > to setup something that works both as an installable package and in-tree > as it does today. But before I go down that path I wanted to see if > there was a desire for such packaging or do people just add > u-boot/tools/patman to their $PATH. yes, please!
On 15 July 2015 at 04:06, Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> wrote: > To make it easier to use patman on other projects add a distutils style > installer. Now patman can be installed with > > cd u-boot/tools/patman && python setup.py install > > There are also the usual distutils options for creating source/binary > distributions of patman. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> > --- > I've been playing with using patman for Linux development and it > occurred to me that patman should really be something that lives on my > default $PATH. That's what I do. > > It's simple enough to create a distutils configuration that makes this a > reality. > > One thing that would make sense for this is to make patman a python > package to avoid polluting site-packages with generic names like 'test' > and 'command'. With a little restructuring it would probably be possible > to setup something that works both as an installable package and in-tree > as it does today. But before I go down that path I wanted to see if > there was a desire for such packaging or do people just add > u-boot/tools/patman to their $PATH. I think it's a good idea, thanks for looking at it. > > Thanks, > Chris > > tools/patman/setup.py | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/patman/setup.py Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> > > diff --git a/tools/patman/setup.py b/tools/patman/setup.py > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..d14ac77 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/patman/setup.py > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +# > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > +# > +from distutils.core import setup > +setup(name='patman', > + version='1.0', > + license='GPL-2.0+', > + scripts=['patman'], > + py_modules=['checkpatch', 'command', 'commit', 'cros_subprocess', > + 'get_maintainer', 'gitutil', 'patchstream', 'project', > + 'series', 'settings', 'terminal', 'test']) > -- > 2.5.0.rc0 >
diff --git a/tools/patman/setup.py b/tools/patman/setup.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d14ac77 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/patman/setup.py @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ +# +from distutils.core import setup +setup(name='patman', + version='1.0', + license='GPL-2.0+', + scripts=['patman'], + py_modules=['checkpatch', 'command', 'commit', 'cros_subprocess', + 'get_maintainer', 'gitutil', 'patchstream', 'project', + 'series', 'settings', 'terminal', 'test'])
To make it easier to use patman on other projects add a distutils style installer. Now patman can be installed with cd u-boot/tools/patman && python setup.py install There are also the usual distutils options for creating source/binary distributions of patman. Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> --- I've been playing with using patman for Linux development and it occurred to me that patman should really be something that lives on my default $PATH. It's simple enough to create a distutils configuration that makes this a reality. One thing that would make sense for this is to make patman a python package to avoid polluting site-packages with generic names like 'test' and 'command'. With a little restructuring it would probably be possible to setup something that works both as an installable package and in-tree as it does today. But before I go down that path I wanted to see if there was a desire for such packaging or do people just add u-boot/tools/patman to their $PATH. Thanks, Chris tools/patman/setup.py | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/patman/setup.py