Message ID | 1372210541-28092-9-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 26 June 2013 02:35, <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > --- a/exec.c > +++ b/exec.c > @@ -2630,3 +2630,12 @@ bool cpu_physical_memory_is_io(hwaddr phys_addr) > memory_region_is_romd(mr)); > } > #endif > + > +void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque) > +{ > + RAMBlock *block; > + > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) { > + func(block->host, block->offset, block->length, opaque); > + } > +} > diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h > index e061e21..92a4223 100644 > --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h > +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h > @@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(hwaddr addr, > extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_rom; > extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_notdirty; > > +typedef void (RAMBlockIterFunc)(void *host_addr, > + ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque); > + > +void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque); > + > #endif The prototype is inside an ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY -- the implementation needs to be as well. thanks -- PMM
On 06/27/2013 03:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 26 June 2013 02:35, <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> --- a/exec.c >> +++ b/exec.c >> @@ -2630,3 +2630,12 @@ bool cpu_physical_memory_is_io(hwaddr phys_addr) >> memory_region_is_romd(mr)); >> } >> #endif >> + >> +void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque) >> +{ >> + RAMBlock *block; >> + >> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) { >> + func(block->host, block->offset, block->length, opaque); >> + } >> +} >> diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h >> index e061e21..92a4223 100644 >> --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h >> +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h >> @@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(hwaddr addr, >> extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_rom; >> extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_notdirty; >> >> +typedef void (RAMBlockIterFunc)(void *host_addr, >> + ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque); >> + >> +void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque); >> + >> #endif > The prototype is inside an ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY -- the > implementation needs to be as well. > > thanks > -- PMM > Good catch. I'll send it in the next patch series ASAP. - Michael
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c index 0b0118b..2e6fc00 100644 --- a/exec.c +++ b/exec.c @@ -2630,3 +2630,12 @@ bool cpu_physical_memory_is_io(hwaddr phys_addr) memory_region_is_romd(mr)); } #endif + +void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque) +{ + RAMBlock *block; + + QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) { + func(block->host, block->offset, block->length, opaque); + } +} diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h index e061e21..92a4223 100644 --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h @@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(hwaddr addr, extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_rom; extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_notdirty; +typedef void (RAMBlockIterFunc)(void *host_addr, + ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque); + +void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque); + #endif #endif /* !CPU_COMMON_H */