| Message ID | a70172863fa7d3c138f788b18d36524bd45b0a73.1536326078.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Headers | show |
| Series | perf: enum overflow in uapi/linux/perf_event.h | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| snowpatch_ozlabs/apply_patch | success | next/apply_patch Successfully applied |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/checkpatch | success | Test checkpatch on branch next |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64le | success | Test build-ppc64le on branch next |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64be | success | Test build-ppc64be on branch next |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc64e | success | Test build-ppc64e on branch next |
| snowpatch_ozlabs/build-ppc32 | success | Test build-ppc32 on branch next |
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is > out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: > > CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the build bots.
On 09/07/2018 01:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is >> out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: >> >> CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c >> ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) > > Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the > build bots. > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# sparse --version 0.5.2 [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# ppc-linux-gcc --version ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:50:18PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > On 09/07/2018 01:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is > > > out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: > > > > > > CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > > ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) > > > > Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the > > build bots. > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# sparse --version > 0.5.2 > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# ppc-linux-gcc --version > ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0 Ah, that's a sparse warning. But does your GCC agree? The thing is, sparse uses the C enum spec, but I suspect GCC uses the C++ enum spec and it all works fine.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:58:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:50:18PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > On 09/07/2018 01:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is > > > > out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: > > > > > > > > CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > > > ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) > > > > > > Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the > > > build bots. > > > > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# sparse --version > > 0.5.2 > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# ppc-linux-gcc --version > > ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0 > > Ah, that's a sparse warning. But does your GCC agree? The thing is, > sparse uses the C enum spec, but I suspect GCC uses the C++ enum spec > and it all works fine. What does the below proglet print on your PPC32 box? I suspect the output will be: 400000000000 and all is well. --- #include <stdio.h> enum ponies { big = 1ULL<<46, }; int main(int argc, char **argv) { unsigned long long val = big; printf("%Lx\n", val); return 0; }
Le 07/09/2018 à 15:58, Peter Zijlstra a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:50:18PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> >> On 09/07/2018 01:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>>> On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is >>>> out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: >>>> >>>> CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c >>>> ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) >>> >>> Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the >>> build bots. >>> >> >> [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# sparse --version >> 0.5.2 >> >> [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# ppc-linux-gcc --version >> ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0 > > Ah, that's a sparse warning. But does your GCC agree? The thing is, > sparse uses the C enum spec, but I suspect GCC uses the C++ enum spec > and it all works fine. > Ah yes, it seems that GCC is happy. So sparse should be fixed instead ? Anyway, is it really correct to put this constant inside that enum, after PERF_SAMPLE_MAX ? Christophe
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: > Ah yes, it seems that GCC is happy. So sparse should be fixed instead ? Ideally, yes. > Anyway, is it really correct to put this constant inside that enum, after > PERF_SAMPLE_MAX ? It is a bit of a hack, agreed. What we do is use the top bit of that word (u64) for some internal state. By placing it there (after MAX) we ensure it is not available for userspace (trying to set it will return in -EINVAL) and by keeping it in the enum we know that bit is unavailable for future use. I have a patch queued that puts a little comment on that: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/commit/?h=perf/urgent&id=34cad593c9ea350a1811ab718e64b36e5cde870c (url is not stable, as I regenerate that git tree from quilt every so often, but it should probably last the day).
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: > Le 07/09/2018 à 15:58, Peter Zijlstra a écrit : > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:50:18PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 09/07/2018 01:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is > > > > > out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: > > > > > > > > > > CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > > > > ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) > > > > > > > > Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the > > > > build bots. > > > > > > > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# sparse --version > > > 0.5.2 > > > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# ppc-linux-gcc --version > > > ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0 > > > > Ah, that's a sparse warning. But does your GCC agree? The thing is, > > sparse uses the C enum spec, but I suspect GCC uses the C++ enum spec > > and it all works fine. Sparse is a bit weird about the exact underlying type used for enums. > Ah yes, it seems that GCC is happy. So sparse should be fixed instead ? I'll investigate (I suppose the same is given on x86-32). -- Luc
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 08:43:59PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: > > Le 07/09/2018 à 15:58, Peter Zijlstra a écrit : > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:50:18PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/07/2018 01:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 01:27:19PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is > > > > > > out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: > > > > > > > > > > > > CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c > > > > > > ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) > > > > > > > > > > Urgh... what compiler is that? I've not seen anything like that from the > > > > > build bots. > > > > > > > > > > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# sparse --version > > > > 0.5.2 > > > > > > > > [root@pc16082vm linux-powerpc]# ppc-linux-gcc --version > > > > ppc-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0 > > > > > > Ah, that's a sparse warning. But does your GCC agree? The thing is, > > > sparse uses the C enum spec, but I suspect GCC uses the C++ enum spec > > > and it all works fine. > > Sparse is a bit weird about the exact underlying type used for enums. > > > Ah yes, it seems that GCC is happy. So sparse should be fixed instead ? > > I'll investigate (I suppose the same is given on x86-32). It's definitively a bug in sparse. A relatively nasty one and which open a can of worms. Fortunately, I had already looked at these problems in May, I just didn't had the time to push the patches. -- Luc
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h index eeb787b1c53c..27c7842bc86a 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h @@ -143,10 +143,10 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format { PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR = 1U << 19, PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 20, /* non-ABI */ - - __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY = 1ULL << 63, }; +#define __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY (1ULL << 63) + /* * values to program into branch_sample_type when PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH is set *
On PPC32, enums are 32 bits, so __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY is out of scope. The following sparse warning is encountered: CHECK arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c ./include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h:147:56: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (8000000000000000 becomes 0) This patch changes it to a #define Fixes: 6cbc304f2f360 ("perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries (mk-II)") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> --- include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)