@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ int rtas_set_power_level(int powerdomain, int level, int *setlevel)
do {
rc = rtas_call(token, 2, 2, setlevel, powerdomain, level);
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
+ } while (rtas_sched_if_busy(rc));
if (rc < 0)
return rtas_error_rc(rc);
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ int rtas_get_sensor(int sensor, int index, int *state)
do {
rc = rtas_call(token, 2, 2, state, sensor, index);
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
+ } while (rtas_sched_if_busy(rc));
if (rc < 0)
return rtas_error_rc(rc);
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ int rtas_set_indicator(int indicator, int index, int new_value)
do {
rc = rtas_call(token, 3, 1, NULL, indicator, index, new_value);
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
+ } while (rtas_sched_if_busy(rc));
if (rc < 0)
return rtas_error_rc(rc);
@@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ void rtas_activate_firmware(void)
do {
fwrc = rtas_call(token, 0, 1, NULL);
- } while (rtas_busy_delay(fwrc));
+ } while (rtas_sched_if_busy(fwrc));
if (fwrc)
pr_err("ibm,activate-firmware failed (%i)\n", fwrc);
rtas_sched_if_busy() has better behavior for RTAS_BUSY (-2) and small extended delay values. Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)