Message ID | 20180307121539.20745-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Series | powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES | expand |
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days. > Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only > with slice code. That file can only be built if PPC_MM_SLICES=y. So let's just remove the ifdef entirely. These days PPC_MM_SLICES == PPC_BOOK3S_64, so we should remove PPC_MM_SLICES #defines wherever possible and replace them with PPC_BOOK3S_64 otherwise IMO. cheers > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S > index c66cb06e73a1..337ef162851d 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S > @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT) > */ > cmpdi r9, 0 > bne- 8f > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES > /* > * user space make sure we are within the allowed limit > */ > @@ -183,7 +185,6 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT) > * really do dynamic patching unfortunately as processes might flip > * between 4k and 64k standard page size > */ > -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES > /* r10 have esid */ > cmpldi r10,16 > /* below SLICE_LOW_TOP */ > -- > 2.14.3
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> a écrit : > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > >> Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES >> these days. >> Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only >> with slice code. > > That file can only be built if PPC_MM_SLICES=y. > > So let's just remove the ifdef entirely. > > These days PPC_MM_SLICES == PPC_BOOK3S_64, so we should remove > PPC_MM_SLICES #defines wherever possible and replace them with > PPC_BOOK3S_64 otherwise IMO. PPC8xx also selects PPC_MM_SLICES when hugepages is selected. Christophe > > cheers > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S >> index c66cb06e73a1..337ef162851d 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S >> @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT) >> */ >> cmpdi r9, 0 >> bne- 8f >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES >> /* >> * user space make sure we are within the allowed limit >> */ >> @@ -183,7 +185,6 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT) >> * really do dynamic patching unfortunately as processes might flip >> * between 4k and 64k standard page size >> */ >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES >> /* r10 have esid */ >> cmpldi r10,16 >> /* below SLICE_LOW_TOP */ >> -- >> 2.14.3
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S index c66cb06e73a1..337ef162851d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT) */ cmpdi r9, 0 bne- 8f + +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES /* * user space make sure we are within the allowed limit */ @@ -183,7 +185,6 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT) * really do dynamic patching unfortunately as processes might flip * between 4k and 64k standard page size */ -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES /* r10 have esid */ cmpldi r10,16 /* below SLICE_LOW_TOP */
Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days. Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only with slice code. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)