| Message ID | 2qtn3bk6pat2xkw7qz34pjpgh6zariuz6zjxhmuuo2jcddfpi4@xn6aqqppl3hi |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] i2c-host changes for v6.10 - pt. 2 | expand |
Hi Andi, > now that the dependencies are fixed and no error report has been > sent on these two patches, I can finally send the second part of > the i2c pull request. Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree yet, only in next. Happy hacking, Wolfram
Hi Wolfram, > > now that the dependencies are fixed and no error report has been > > sent on these two patches, I can finally send the second part of > > the i2c pull request. > > Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because > e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated > I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree > yet, only in next. argh! Good catch! I don't have drm amd in my config. Indeed I don't see Hiner's patch in the DRM pull request and not even in the AMD's. OK that needs to shift to the 6.11 pull request. Thanks, Andi
> > Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because > > e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated > > I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree > > yet, only in next. > > argh! Good catch! I don't have drm amd in my config. Me neither, I just checked with 'git grep I2C_CLASS_SPD' :) > OK that needs to shift to the 6.11 pull request. Hmm, that gives too much time for new users to appear IMO. If you don't mind, I'll take over and I'll ping them to apply the drm patch soonish, so I can apply the removal. Doesn't matter if it becomes rc2 or rc3.
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Pulled, but I can't send out to Linus because > > > e22e0e483b2c76728ccd119fdcfea81eb176b3a5 (drm/amd/pm: remove deprecated > > > I2C_CLASS_SPD support from newly added SMU_14_0_2) is not in his tree > > > yet, only in next. > > > > argh! Good catch! I don't have drm amd in my config. > > Me neither, I just checked with 'git grep I2C_CLASS_SPD' :) > > > OK that needs to shift to the 6.11 pull request. > > Hmm, that gives too much time for new users to appear IMO. If you don't > mind, I'll take over and I'll ping them to apply the drm patch soonish, > so I can apply the removal. Doesn't matter if it becomes rc2 or rc3. DRM pull requests for merge window are normally sent during -rc5 and only urgent patches are accepted latest in -rc6. Heiner's patch was taken later. I can try to to ping Alex Deucher on that specific patch. In the meantime, I will send a pull request with just Christophe's patch that can safely be taken. Thanks, Andi
Hi Wolfram, now that the dependencies are fixed and no error report has been sent on these two patches, I can finally send the second part of the i2c pull request. Thanks, Andi The following changes since commit c760b3725e52403dc1b28644fb09c47a83cacea6: Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-05-22-17-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm (2024-05-22 18:59:29 -0700) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git tags/i2c-host-6.10-pt2 for you to fetch changes up to e61bcf42d290e73025bab38e0e55a5586c2d8ad5: i2c: Remove I2C_CLASS_SPD (2024-05-23 13:38:15 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Removed the SPD class of i2c devices from the device core. Additionally, a cleanup in the Synquacer code removes the pclk from the global structure, as it is used only in the probe. Therefore, it is now declared locally. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Christophe JAILLET (1): i2c: synquacer: Remove a clk reference from struct synquacer_i2c Heiner Kallweit (1): i2c: Remove I2C_CLASS_SPD drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-synquacer.c | 11 +++++------ include/linux/i2c.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)