diff mbox series

[3/3] i2c: mux: gpio: don't fiddle with GPIOLIB internals

Message ID 20231011130204.52265-4-brgl@bgdev.pl
State Awaiting Upstream
Headers show
Series i2c: mux: don't access GPIOLIB internal structures | expand

Commit Message

Bartosz Golaszewski Oct. 11, 2023, 1:02 p.m. UTC
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Use the relevant API functions to retrieve the address of the
underlying struct device instead of accessing GPIOLIB private structures
manually.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Rosin Oct. 11, 2023, 2:59 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi!

2023-10-11 at 15:02, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> Use the relevant API functions to retrieve the address of the
> underlying struct device instead of accessing GPIOLIB private structures
> manually.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> index 5d5cbe0130cd..48a872a8196b 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -14,8 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> -/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */
> -#include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h"
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>  
>  struct gpiomux {
>  	struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data;
> @@ -176,7 +175,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) {
> -		struct device *gpio_dev;
> +		struct gpio_device *gdev;
> +		struct device *dev;
>  		struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
>  		enum gpiod_flags flag;
>  
> @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		if (!muxc->mux_locked)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		/* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */
> -		gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev;
> -		muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root;
> +		gdev = gpiod_to_gpio_device(gpiod);
> +		dev = gpio_device_to_device(gdev);
> +		muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(dev) == root;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (muxc->mux_locked)

Very nice to see that wart gone! The only small question I have
is if these helpers are needed elsewhere, or if a more "direct"
gpiod_to_device() would have been sufficient? That said, I have
zero problem with this new code as-is, and that detail is of
course squarely in gpio-land.

Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>

Cheers,
Peter
Bartosz Golaszewski Oct. 11, 2023, 3:03 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 4:59 PM Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> 2023-10-11 at 15:02, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Use the relevant API functions to retrieve the address of the
> > underlying struct device instead of accessing GPIOLIB private structures
> > manually.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> > index 5d5cbe0130cd..48a872a8196b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> > @@ -14,8 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/bits.h>
> >  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > -/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */
> > -#include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h"
> > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> >
> >  struct gpiomux {
> >       struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data;
> > @@ -176,7 +175,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       }
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) {
> > -             struct device *gpio_dev;
> > +             struct gpio_device *gdev;
> > +             struct device *dev;
> >               struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
> >               enum gpiod_flags flag;
> >
> > @@ -195,9 +195,9 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >               if (!muxc->mux_locked)
> >                       continue;
> >
> > -             /* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */
> > -             gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev;
> > -             muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root;
> > +             gdev = gpiod_to_gpio_device(gpiod);
> > +             dev = gpio_device_to_device(gdev);
> > +             muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(dev) == root;
> >       }
> >
> >       if (muxc->mux_locked)
>
> Very nice to see that wart gone! The only small question I have
> is if these helpers are needed elsewhere, or if a more "direct"
> gpiod_to_device() would have been sufficient? That said, I have
> zero problem with this new code as-is, and that detail is of
> course squarely in gpio-land.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>

gpiod_to_gpio_device() will be used in at least 10 other places. I
haven't identified any other potential user for
gpio_device_to_device() yet but I haven't looked hard yet either.

Bart

>
> Cheers,
> Peter
Andy Shevchenko Oct. 11, 2023, 3:18 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 5:59 PM Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:
> 2023-10-11 at 15:02, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

> > Use the relevant API functions to retrieve the address of the
> > underlying struct device instead of accessing GPIOLIB private structures
> > manually.

> Very nice to see that wart gone! The only small question I have
> is if these helpers are needed elsewhere, or if a more "direct"
> gpiod_to_device() would have been sufficient?

Same concern is here. But I'm fine with the code.
Wolfram Sang Oct. 11, 2023, 4:41 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Bartosz,

> > > -/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */
> > > -#include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h"
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>

Hooray! \o/

> gpiod_to_gpio_device() will be used in at least 10 other places. I
> haven't identified any other potential user for
> gpio_device_to_device() yet but I haven't looked hard yet either.

Same here. Looked a little bit, found nothing.

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
index 5d5cbe0130cd..48a872a8196b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
@@ -14,8 +14,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/bits.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
-/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */
-#include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h"
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
 
 struct gpiomux {
 	struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data;
@@ -176,7 +175,8 @@  static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) {
-		struct device *gpio_dev;
+		struct gpio_device *gdev;
+		struct device *dev;
 		struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
 		enum gpiod_flags flag;
 
@@ -195,9 +195,9 @@  static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		if (!muxc->mux_locked)
 			continue;
 
-		/* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */
-		gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev;
-		muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root;
+		gdev = gpiod_to_gpio_device(gpiod);
+		dev = gpio_device_to_device(gdev);
+		muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(dev) == root;
 	}
 
 	if (muxc->mux_locked)