| Message ID | 8d5a6b127c579be29db4.1381226815@argentina |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On 10/08/13 12:06, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> > > --- > package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk > --- a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk > +++ b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > I2C_TOOLS_VERSION = 3.1.0 > I2C_TOOLS_SOURCE = i2c-tools-$(I2C_TOOLS_VERSION).tar.bz2 > I2C_TOOLS_SITE = http://dl.lm-sensors.org/i2c-tools/releases > +I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE = GPLv2 All files are GPLv2+ AFAICS. Only py-smbus/setup.py claims that the package is GPLv2, but that's just wrong. Regards, Arnout > +I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING > > define I2C_TOOLS_BUILD_CMDS > $(MAKE) $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) -C $(@D) > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot@busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > >
Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote: >On 10/08/13 12:06, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> >> >> --- >> package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk | 2 ++ >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk >> --- a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk >> +++ b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk >> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ >> I2C_TOOLS_VERSION = 3.1.0 >> I2C_TOOLS_SOURCE = i2c-tools-$(I2C_TOOLS_VERSION).tar.bz2 >> I2C_TOOLS_SITE = http://dl.lm-sensors.org/i2c-tools/releases >> +I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE = GPLv2 > > All files are GPLv2+ AFAICS. Only py-smbus/setup.py claims that the >package is GPLv2, but that's just wrong. Why is that wrong? I reasoned that if one of the components is gplv2, and the rest is gplv2+, then the whole needs to be gplv2. Best regards, Thomas
On 10/08/13 22:22, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote: >> On 10/08/13 12:06, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> >>> >>> --- >>> package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk | 2 ++ >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk >>> --- a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk >>> +++ b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk >>> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ >>> I2C_TOOLS_VERSION = 3.1.0 >>> I2C_TOOLS_SOURCE = i2c-tools-$(I2C_TOOLS_VERSION).tar.bz2 >>> I2C_TOOLS_SITE = http://dl.lm-sensors.org/i2c-tools/releases >>> +I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE = GPLv2 >> >> All files are GPLv2+ AFAICS. Only py-smbus/setup.py claims that the >> package is GPLv2, but that's just wrong. > > Why is that wrong? > > I reasoned that if one of the components is gplv2, and the rest is gplv2+, then the whole needs to be gplv2. setup.py itself isn't GPLv2, it just claims that the package is GPLv2. But it isn't, since each file says it GPLv2+. Scratch that: the python module is GPLv2 only. But I don't think we build the python module anyway. Just to be safe, put: I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE = GPLv2+, GPLv2 (py-smbus) Regards, Arnout
diff --git a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk --- a/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk +++ b/package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ I2C_TOOLS_VERSION = 3.1.0 I2C_TOOLS_SOURCE = i2c-tools-$(I2C_TOOLS_VERSION).tar.bz2 I2C_TOOLS_SITE = http://dl.lm-sensors.org/i2c-tools/releases +I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE = GPLv2 +I2C_TOOLS_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING define I2C_TOOLS_BUILD_CMDS $(MAKE) $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) -C $(@D)
Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com> --- package/i2c-tools/i2c-tools.mk | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)