| Message ID | 1353543503-8952-33-git-send-email-s.martin49@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
Hi Samuel, On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 01:18:22AM +0100, Samuel Martin wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com> > --- > package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk > index 8799a85..4392b50 100644 > --- a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk > +++ b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk > @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ > > RRDTOOL_VERSION = 1.2.30 > RRDTOOL_SITE = http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/pub > +RRDTOOL_LICENSE = GPLv2+ with FLOSS license exceptions as explained in COPYRIGHT > +RRDTOOL_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING Shouldn't COPYRIGHT also be listed with the license files? baruch > + > RRDTOOL_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf freetype libart libpng zlib > RRDTOOL_AUTORECONF = YES > RRDTOOL_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
Hi Baruch, all, 2012/11/22 Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>: > Hi Samuel, > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 01:18:22AM +0100, Samuel Martin wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com> >> --- >> package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk >> index 8799a85..4392b50 100644 >> --- a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk >> +++ b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk >> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ >> >> RRDTOOL_VERSION = 1.2.30 >> RRDTOOL_SITE = http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/pub >> +RRDTOOL_LICENSE = GPLv2+ with FLOSS license exceptions as explained in COPYRIGHT >> +RRDTOOL_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING > > Shouldn't COPYRIGHT also be listed with the license files? The Copyright file just tells us "wrt the license, you can do that and that, but not that with this software", with some real use case. Shall we consider as part of the license files? Regards,
On 22/11/12 11:07, Samuel Martin wrote: > Hi Baruch, all, > > 2012/11/22 Baruch Siach<baruch@tkos.co.il>: > > Hi Samuel, > > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 01:18:22AM +0100, Samuel Martin wrote: > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin<s.martin49@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk > >> index 8799a85..4392b50 100644 > >> --- a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk > >> +++ b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk > >> @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ > >> > >> RRDTOOL_VERSION = 1.2.30 > >> RRDTOOL_SITE = http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/pub > >> +RRDTOOL_LICENSE = GPLv2+ with FLOSS license exceptions as explained in COPYRIGHT > >> +RRDTOOL_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING > > > > Shouldn't COPYRIGHT also be listed with the license files? > The Copyright file just tells us "wrt the license, you can do that and > that, but not that with this software", > with some real use case. > > Shall we consider as part of the license files? Since you refer to it in the RRDTOOL_LICENSE, yes the COPYRIGHT file should be included. Note that "GPLv2+ with exceptions" is probably enough, since the user should anyway look at COPYRIGHT to find out the details. Regards, Arnout
diff --git a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk index 8799a85..4392b50 100644 --- a/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk +++ b/package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ RRDTOOL_VERSION = 1.2.30 RRDTOOL_SITE = http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/pub +RRDTOOL_LICENSE = GPLv2+ with FLOSS license exceptions as explained in COPYRIGHT +RRDTOOL_LICENSE_FILES = COPYING + RRDTOOL_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf freetype libart libpng zlib RRDTOOL_AUTORECONF = YES RRDTOOL_INSTALL_STAGING = YES
Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com> --- package/rrdtool/rrdtool.mk | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)