| Message ID | 20181109165726.13748-1-wsa@the-dreams.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
| Series | i2c: nvidia-gpu: make pm_ops static | expand |
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 05:57:26PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > sparse rightfully says: > > warning: symbol 'gpu_i2c_driver_pm' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> I need to fast-track this. Otherwise code checkers will complain when I push the driver out. The other patches have more time for review. Sorry for the hazzle. Applied to for-current.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c index 744f5e42636b..8822357bca0c 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int gpu_i2c_resume(struct device *dev) return 0; } -UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS(gpu_i2c_driver_pm, NULL, gpu_i2c_resume, NULL); +static UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS(gpu_i2c_driver_pm, NULL, gpu_i2c_resume, NULL); static struct pci_driver gpu_i2c_driver = { .name = "nvidia-gpu",
sparse rightfully says: warning: symbol 'gpu_i2c_driver_pm' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nvidia-gpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)