diff mbox series

eeprom: at24: switch to device-managed version of i2c_new_dummy

Message ID 9221930c-a64d-0c7c-2a72-75b25b76de4a@gmail.com
State Superseded
Delegated to: Bartosz Golaszewski
Headers show
Series eeprom: at24: switch to device-managed version of i2c_new_dummy | expand

Commit Message

Heiner Kallweit Dec. 4, 2017, 7:51 p.m. UTC
Make use of recently introduced device-managed version of
i2c_new_dummy to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 15 ++++-----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Bartosz Golaszewski Dec. 5, 2017, 8:18 a.m. UTC | #1
2017-12-04 20:51 GMT+01:00 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>:
> Make use of recently introduced device-managed version of
> i2c_new_dummy to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 15 ++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index 625b00166..9e9fe69b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -621,9 +621,10 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>
>         /* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
>         for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
> -               at24->client[i].client = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
> -                                                      client->addr + i);
> -               if (!at24->client[i].client) {
> +               at24->client[i].client = devm_i2c_new_dummy(&client->dev,
> +                                                           client->adapter,
> +                                                           client->addr + i);
> +               if (IS_ERR(at24->client[i].client)) {
>                         dev_err(&client->dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n",
>                                         client->addr + i);
>                         err = -EADDRINUSE;
> @@ -686,10 +687,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>         return 0;
>
>  err_clients:
> -       for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++)
> -               if (at24->client[i].client)
> -                       i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
> -
>         pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>
>         return err;
> @@ -698,15 +695,11 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
>         struct at24_data *at24;
> -       int i;
>
>         at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
>         nvmem_unregister(at24->nvmem);
>
> -       for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
> -               i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
> -
>         pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>         pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
>
> --
> 2.15.1
>
>

Hi Heiner,

I don't have the patch introducing the devres routine in my inbox.
Could you resend the two patches as a series? Note: please Cc the
linux-kernel mailing list too. Also: maybe you could create a device
managed version of i2c_new_secondary_device() if you're at it? Could
use the same release callback.

Thanks,
Bartosz
Heiner Kallweit Dec. 5, 2017, 7:39 p.m. UTC | #2
Am 05.12.2017 um 09:18 schrieb Bartosz Golaszewski:
> 2017-12-04 20:51 GMT+01:00 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>:
>> Make use of recently introduced device-managed version of
>> i2c_new_dummy to simplify the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 15 ++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> index 625b00166..9e9fe69b4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
>> @@ -621,9 +621,10 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>>
>>         /* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
>>         for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
>> -               at24->client[i].client = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
>> -                                                      client->addr + i);
>> -               if (!at24->client[i].client) {
>> +               at24->client[i].client = devm_i2c_new_dummy(&client->dev,
>> +                                                           client->adapter,
>> +                                                           client->addr + i);
>> +               if (IS_ERR(at24->client[i].client)) {
>>                         dev_err(&client->dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n",
>>                                         client->addr + i);
>>                         err = -EADDRINUSE;
>> @@ -686,10 +687,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>>         return 0;
>>
>>  err_clients:
>> -       for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++)
>> -               if (at24->client[i].client)
>> -                       i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
>> -
>>         pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>>
>>         return err;
>> @@ -698,15 +695,11 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>>  static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>  {
>>         struct at24_data *at24;
>> -       int i;
>>
>>         at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>
>>         nvmem_unregister(at24->nvmem);
>>
>> -       for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
>> -               i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
>> -
>>         pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>>         pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
>>
>> --
>> 2.15.1
>>
>>
> 
> Hi Heiner,
> 
> I don't have the patch introducing the devres routine in my inbox.
> Could you resend the two patches as a series? Note: please Cc the
> linux-kernel mailing list too. Also: maybe you could create a device
> managed version of i2c_new_secondary_device() if you're at it? Could
> use the same release callback.
> 
OK, will resubmit both patches as a series.

Regarding i2c_new_secondary_device I checked and didn't find a single
user of this function. Therefore I'm afraid maintainers would be
reluctant to accept a device-managed version which would sit idle too.

Rgds, Heiner

> Thanks,
> Bartosz
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 625b00166..9e9fe69b4 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -621,9 +621,10 @@  static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 
 	/* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
 	for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
-		at24->client[i].client = i2c_new_dummy(client->adapter,
-						       client->addr + i);
-		if (!at24->client[i].client) {
+		at24->client[i].client = devm_i2c_new_dummy(&client->dev,
+							    client->adapter,
+							    client->addr + i);
+		if (IS_ERR(at24->client[i].client)) {
 			dev_err(&client->dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n",
 					client->addr + i);
 			err = -EADDRINUSE;
@@ -686,10 +687,6 @@  static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	return 0;
 
 err_clients:
-	for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++)
-		if (at24->client[i].client)
-			i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
-
 	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
 
 	return err;
@@ -698,15 +695,11 @@  static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
 	struct at24_data *at24;
-	int i;
 
 	at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 
 	nvmem_unregister(at24->nvmem);
 
-	for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
-		i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
-
 	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
 	pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);