mbox series

[PULL,REQUEST] i2c-mux for 4.15-rc1

Message ID 21496b51-370f-2009-b25c-881c524fe2b9@axentia.se
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [PULL,REQUEST] i2c-mux for 4.15-rc1 | expand

Pull-request

https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git i2c-mux/for-next

Message

Peter Rosin Oct. 20, 2017, 3:27 p.m. UTC
Hi Wolfram,

This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch
that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver.

Please pull.

Cheers,
Peter

The following changes since commit 33d930e59a98fa10a0db9f56c7fa2f21a4aef9b9:

  Linux 4.14-rc5 (2017-10-15 21:01:12 -0400)

are available in the git repository at:

  https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git i2c-mux/for-next

for you to fetch changes up to 3997fb74846f35d0364c5e88e54bc9b166d5a1bc:

  i2c: mux: reg: use of_property_read_bool() (2017-10-20 16:33:07 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Sergei Shtylyov (1):
      i2c: mux: reg: use of_property_read_bool()

 drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Wolfram Sang Oct. 26, 2017, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:27:34PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch
> that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver.
> 
> Please pull.

Thanks, pulled.
Wolfram Sang Oct. 27, 2017, 7:27 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Peda,

> This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch
> that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver.

Did this maybe slip through the cracks?

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/816846/

("[trivial] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: Spelling s/required is/required
if/")

Regards,

   Wolfram
Peter Rosin Oct. 27, 2017, 9:05 p.m. UTC | #3
On 2017-10-27 21:27, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Peda,
> 
>> This cycle has been real quiet for me. There's only the one trivial patch
>> that somewhat simplifies DT parsing in the i2c-mux-reg driver.
> 
> Did this maybe slip through the cracks?
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/816846/
> 
> ("[trivial] dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: Spelling s/required is/required
> if/")

Right. Blush. I blame the immense flow of patches. I just can't seem to
keep up... :-) Anyway, thanks for catching this and sorry for making you
do that.

Some words for the merge commit:

This trivial patch managed to fall through the cracks and was forgotten
in the first pull request, as noticed by Wolfram. Thanks.

Please pull.

Cheers,
Peter

The following changes since commit 3997fb74846f35d0364c5e88e54bc9b166d5a1bc:

  i2c: mux: reg: use of_property_read_bool() (2017-10-20 16:33:07 +0200)

are available in the git repository at:

  https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git tags/i2c-mux/for-4.15-2

for you to fetch changes up to fcc046801b934ad27ba80e20e3e0f4c97957af58:

  dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: spelling s/required is/required if/ (2017-10-27 22:45:28 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Geert Uytterhoeven (1):
      dt-bindings: i2c: i2c-mux: spelling s/required is/required if/

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Wolfram Sang Oct. 28, 2017, 12:25 p.m. UTC | #4
> Right. Blush. I blame the immense flow of patches. I just can't seem to
> keep up... :-) Anyway, thanks for catching this and sorry for making you
> do that.

No worries. Patchwork makes it easy for me to track patches. Speaking
of, if you register at patchwork.ozlabs.org, then I could assign you the
patches for the mux subsystem. Then you'd have the patches listed. Just
saying...

> Please pull.

Thanks, pulled.
Peter Rosin Oct. 30, 2017, 8:31 a.m. UTC | #5
On 2017-10-28 14:25, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> Right. Blush. I blame the immense flow of patches. I just can't seem to
>> keep up... :-) Anyway, thanks for catching this and sorry for making you
>> do that.
> 
> No worries. Patchwork makes it easy for me to track patches. Speaking
> of, if you register at patchwork.ozlabs.org, then I could assign you the
> patches for the mux subsystem. Then you'd have the patches listed. Just
> saying...

Sounds like a splendid idea. I signed up as 'peda'.

Do you need anything else?

Cheers,
Peter
Wolfram Sang Oct. 30, 2017, 8:39 a.m. UTC | #6
> Sounds like a splendid idea. I signed up as 'peda'.

Great!

> Do you need anything else?

Nope, I need to ask Jeremy to add you to the i2c project. Can't do this
myself, sadly. Will keep you updated!