diff mbox

[2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND

Message ID 20170821134951.18848-2-lvivier@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Laurent Vivier Aug. 21, 2017, 1:49 p.m. UTC
cpumask is the list of CPUs present when the queue is built.
If a new CPU is hotplugged, this list is not updated,
and when the scheduler asks for a CPU id, blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
can return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
And in this case _blk_mq_run_hw_queue() can be executed by the new CPU
(that is not present in cpumask) and raises the following warning:

    WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
            cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu));

To fix this problem, this patch modifies blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
to only return a CPU id present in cpumask.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Tejun Heo Aug. 21, 2017, 2:48 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> cpumask is the list of CPUs present when the queue is built.
> If a new CPU is hotplugged, this list is not updated,
> and when the scheduler asks for a CPU id, blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
> can return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> And in this case _blk_mq_run_hw_queue() can be executed by the new CPU
> (that is not present in cpumask) and raises the following warning:
> 
>     WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
>             cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu));
> 
> To fix this problem, this patch modifies blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
> to only return a CPU id present in cpumask.

So, this one isn't needed either.

Thanks.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 4603b115e234..bdac1e654814 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1126,9 +1126,6 @@  static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
  */
 static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
-	if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
-		return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
-
 	if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
 		int next_cpu;