diff mbox

i2c: remove __init from i2c_register_board_info()

Message ID 1465343547-19974-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Luis Chamberlain June 7, 2016, 11:52 p.m. UTC
As of next-20160607 with allyesconfig we get this linker failure:

  MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x21bc0d): Section mismatch in reference from
the function intel_scu_devices_create() to the function
.init.text:i2c_register_board_info()

This is caused by the fact that intel_scu_devices_create() calls
i2c_register_board_info() and intel_scu_devices_create() is not
annotated with __init. This typically involves manual code
inspection and if one is certain this is correct we would
just peg intel_scu_devices_create() with a __ref annotation.

In this case this would be wrong though as the
intel_scu_devices_create() call is exported, and used in
the ipc_probe() on drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c.
The issue is that even though builtin_pci_driver(ipc_driver)
is used this just exposes the probe routine, which can occur
at any point in time if this bus supports hotplug. A race
can happen between kernel_init_freeable() that calls the init
calls (in this case registeres the intel_scu_ipc.c driver, and
later free_initmem(), which would free the i2c_register_board_info().
If a probe happens later in boot i2c_register_board_info() would
not be present and we should get a page fault.

Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-boardinfo.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Luis Chamberlain June 14, 2016, 10:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:52:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> As of next-20160607 with allyesconfig we get this linker failure:
> 
>   MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x21bc0d): Section mismatch in reference from
> the function intel_scu_devices_create() to the function
> .init.text:i2c_register_board_info()
> 
> This is caused by the fact that intel_scu_devices_create() calls
> i2c_register_board_info() and intel_scu_devices_create() is not
> annotated with __init. This typically involves manual code
> inspection and if one is certain this is correct we would
> just peg intel_scu_devices_create() with a __ref annotation.
> 
> In this case this would be wrong though as the
> intel_scu_devices_create() call is exported, and used in
> the ipc_probe() on drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c.
> The issue is that even though builtin_pci_driver(ipc_driver)
> is used this just exposes the probe routine, which can occur
> at any point in time if this bus supports hotplug. A race
> can happen between kernel_init_freeable() that calls the init
> calls (in this case registeres the intel_scu_ipc.c driver, and
> later free_initmem(), which would free the i2c_register_board_info().
> If a probe happens later in boot i2c_register_board_info() would
> not be present and we should get a page fault.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>

I don't see this merged yet on linux-next and this is still an issue.

 *Poke*

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wolfram Sang June 19, 2016, 12:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:52:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> As of next-20160607 with allyesconfig we get this linker failure:
> 
>   MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x21bc0d): Section mismatch in reference from
> the function intel_scu_devices_create() to the function
> .init.text:i2c_register_board_info()
> 
> This is caused by the fact that intel_scu_devices_create() calls
> i2c_register_board_info() and intel_scu_devices_create() is not
> annotated with __init. This typically involves manual code
> inspection and if one is certain this is correct we would
> just peg intel_scu_devices_create() with a __ref annotation.
> 
> In this case this would be wrong though as the
> intel_scu_devices_create() call is exported, and used in
> the ipc_probe() on drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c.
> The issue is that even though builtin_pci_driver(ipc_driver)
> is used this just exposes the probe routine, which can occur
> at any point in time if this bus supports hotplug. A race
> can happen between kernel_init_freeable() that calls the init
> calls (in this case registeres the intel_scu_ipc.c driver, and
> later free_initmem(), which would free the i2c_register_board_info().
> If a probe happens later in boot i2c_register_board_info() would
> not be present and we should get a page fault.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>

Applied to for-current, thanks! Do you think this should go to stable?
Luis Chamberlain June 20, 2016, 3:12 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 02:15:38PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:52:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > As of next-20160607 with allyesconfig we get this linker failure:
> > 
> >   MODPOST vmlinux.o
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x21bc0d): Section mismatch in reference from
> > the function intel_scu_devices_create() to the function
> > .init.text:i2c_register_board_info()
> > 
> > This is caused by the fact that intel_scu_devices_create() calls
> > i2c_register_board_info() and intel_scu_devices_create() is not
> > annotated with __init. This typically involves manual code
> > inspection and if one is certain this is correct we would
> > just peg intel_scu_devices_create() with a __ref annotation.
> > 
> > In this case this would be wrong though as the
> > intel_scu_devices_create() call is exported, and used in
> > the ipc_probe() on drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c.
> > The issue is that even though builtin_pci_driver(ipc_driver)
> > is used this just exposes the probe routine, which can occur
> > at any point in time if this bus supports hotplug. A race
> > can happen between kernel_init_freeable() that calls the init
> > calls (in this case registeres the intel_scu_ipc.c driver, and
> > later free_initmem(), which would free the i2c_register_board_info().
> > If a probe happens later in boot i2c_register_board_info() would
> > not be present and we should get a page fault.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> 
> Applied to for-current, thanks! Do you think this should go to stable?

Its a theoretical race, but a real one, but does fix allyesconfig builds.
Up to you.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-boardinfo.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-boardinfo.c
index e33022e..77b1589 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-boardinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-boardinfo.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__i2c_first_dynamic_bus_num);
  * The board info passed can safely be __initdata, but be careful of embedded
  * pointers (for platform_data, functions, etc) since that won't be copied.
  */
-int __init
+int
 i2c_register_board_info(int busnum,
 	struct i2c_board_info const *info, unsigned len)
 {