diff mbox

[1/2,v3] Revert "powerpc/eeh: Fix crash in eeh_add_device_early() on Cell"

Message ID 1460402243-24346-1-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Guilherme G. Piccoli April 11, 2016, 7:17 p.m. UTC
This reverts commit 89a51df5ab1d38b257300b8ac940bbac3bb0eb9b.

The function eeh_add_device_early() is used to perform EEH initialization in
devices added later on the system, like in hotplug/DLPAR scenarios. Since the
commit 89a51df5ab1d ("powerpc/eeh: Fix crash in eeh_add_device_early() on Cell")
a new check was introduced in this function - Cell has no EEH capabilities
which led to kernel oops if hotplug was performed, so checking for
eeh_enabled() was introduced to avoid the issue.

However, in architectures that EEH is present like pSeries or PowerNV, we might
reach a case in which no PCI devices are present on boot time and so EEH is not
initialized. Then, if a device is added via DLPAR for example,
eeh_add_device_early() fails because eeh_enabled() is false, and EEH end up
not being enabled at all.

This reverts the aforementioned patch since a new verification was introduced by
the commit d91dafc02f42 ("powerpc/eeh: Delay probing EEH device during hotplug")
and so the original Cell issue does not happen anymore.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Michael Ellerman May 12, 2016, 11:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 2016-11-04 at 19:17:22 UTC, "Guilherme G. Piccoli" wrote:
> This reverts commit 89a51df5ab1d38b257300b8ac940bbac3bb0eb9b.
> 
> The function eeh_add_device_early() is used to perform EEH initialization in
> devices added later on the system, like in hotplug/DLPAR scenarios. Since the
> commit 89a51df5ab1d ("powerpc/eeh: Fix crash in eeh_add_device_early() on Cell")
> a new check was introduced in this function - Cell has no EEH capabilities
> which led to kernel oops if hotplug was performed, so checking for
> eeh_enabled() was introduced to avoid the issue.
> 
> However, in architectures that EEH is present like pSeries or PowerNV, we might
> reach a case in which no PCI devices are present on boot time and so EEH is not
> initialized. Then, if a device is added via DLPAR for example,
> eeh_add_device_early() fails because eeh_enabled() is false, and EEH end up
> not being enabled at all.
> 
> This reverts the aforementioned patch since a new verification was introduced by
> the commit d91dafc02f42 ("powerpc/eeh: Delay probing EEH device during hotplug")
> and so the original Cell issue does not happen anymore.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/c2078d9ef600bdbe568c89e5dd

cheers
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index 6544017..6758484 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@  void eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn)
 	struct pci_controller *phb;
 	struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
 
-	if (!edev || !eeh_enabled())
+	if (!edev)
 		return;
 
 	if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE))