| Message ID | 1413999667-21348-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Ping! It would be nice to be able to get glib2.12 builds fixed... thanks -- PMM On 22 October 2014 18:41, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > The g_hash_table_iter_* functions for iterating through a hash table > are not present in glib 2.12, which is our current minimum requirement. > Rewrite the code to use g_hash_table_foreach() instead. > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> > --- > I have tested that this builds with a glib 2.12, and also that it > passes 'make check', but no further testing beyond that. Somebody > with an spapr migration test should check it doesn't break things... > > The observant will note that since this is fixing breakage > introduced in commit 9a321e92343 (merged in late June) we > obviously released 2.1 in a "doesn't build all targets on > glib 2.12" state, and nobody actually complained... So there's > maybe scope for debate about moving the minimum version up, > but I think for 2.2 we should stick with the current definition. > > The cc:stable is in the interests of fixing that build breakage > in 2.1.x. > > hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c > index ad0da7f..21b95b3 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c > @@ -704,28 +704,34 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_pci_msi = { > }, > }; > > +static void spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs(gpointer key, gpointer value, > + gpointer opaque) > +{ > + sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque; > + > + sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].key = *(uint32_t *)key; > + sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *)value; > + sphb->msi_devs_num++; > +} > + > static void spapr_pci_pre_save(void *opaque) > { > sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque; > - GHashTableIter iter; > - gpointer key, value; > - int i; > + int msi_devs_num; > > if (sphb->msi_devs) { > g_free(sphb->msi_devs); > sphb->msi_devs = NULL; > } > - sphb->msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi); > - if (!sphb->msi_devs_num) { > + sphb->msi_devs_num = 0; > + msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi); > + if (!msi_devs_num) { > return; > } > - sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(sphb->msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig)); > + sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig)); > > - g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, sphb->msi); > - for (i = 0; g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value); ++i) { > - sphb->msi_devs[i].key = *(uint32_t *) key; > - sphb->msi_devs[i].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *) value; > - } > + g_hash_table_foreach(sphb->msi, spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs, sphb); > + assert(sphb->msi_devs_num == msi_devs_num); > } > > static int spapr_pci_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id) > -- > 1.9.1
On 30.10.14 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Ping! It would be nice to be able to get glib2.12 builds fixed...
Thanks, applied to ppc-next.
Alex
On 11/03/2014 03:31 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 30.10.14 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Ping! It would be nice to be able to get glib2.12 builds fixed... > > Thanks, applied to ppc-next. Uff. I misread the original mail and decided I have to do the patch :) I checked ppc-next, works fine, thanks!
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c index ad0da7f..21b95b3 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c @@ -704,28 +704,34 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_pci_msi = { }, }; +static void spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs(gpointer key, gpointer value, + gpointer opaque) +{ + sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque; + + sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].key = *(uint32_t *)key; + sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *)value; + sphb->msi_devs_num++; +} + static void spapr_pci_pre_save(void *opaque) { sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque; - GHashTableIter iter; - gpointer key, value; - int i; + int msi_devs_num; if (sphb->msi_devs) { g_free(sphb->msi_devs); sphb->msi_devs = NULL; } - sphb->msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi); - if (!sphb->msi_devs_num) { + sphb->msi_devs_num = 0; + msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi); + if (!msi_devs_num) { return; } - sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(sphb->msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig)); + sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig)); - g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, sphb->msi); - for (i = 0; g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value); ++i) { - sphb->msi_devs[i].key = *(uint32_t *) key; - sphb->msi_devs[i].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *) value; - } + g_hash_table_foreach(sphb->msi, spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs, sphb); + assert(sphb->msi_devs_num == msi_devs_num); } static int spapr_pci_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
The g_hash_table_iter_* functions for iterating through a hash table are not present in glib 2.12, which is our current minimum requirement. Rewrite the code to use g_hash_table_foreach() instead. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> --- I have tested that this builds with a glib 2.12, and also that it passes 'make check', but no further testing beyond that. Somebody with an spapr migration test should check it doesn't break things... The observant will note that since this is fixing breakage introduced in commit 9a321e92343 (merged in late June) we obviously released 2.1 in a "doesn't build all targets on glib 2.12" state, and nobody actually complained... So there's maybe scope for debate about moving the minimum version up, but I think for 2.2 we should stick with the current definition. The cc:stable is in the interests of fixing that build breakage in 2.1.x. hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)