diff mbox

[12/44] mfd: ab8500-sysctrl: Register with kernel poweroff handler

Message ID 1412659726-29957-13-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Guenter Roeck Oct. 7, 2014, 5:28 a.m. UTC
Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
directly. Register with a low priority value of 64 to reflect that
the original code only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
 drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Lee Jones Oct. 7, 2014, 8 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with a low priority value of 64 to reflect that
> the original code only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> index 8e0dae5..677438f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@

[...]

> +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> +			    void *unused2)
>  {
>  	sigset_t old;
>  	sigset_t all;
> @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
>  	struct power_supply *psy;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> -		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> -		return;
> -	}

Can you explain the purpose of this change please?

>  	/*
>  	 * If we have a charger connected and we're powering off,
>  	 * reboot into charge-only mode.
> @@ -83,8 +80,15 @@ shutdown:
>  					 AB8500_STW4500CTRL1_SWRESET4500N);
>  		(void)sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &old, NULL);
>  	}
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
>  }
Catalin Marinas Oct. 9, 2014, 10:36 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> > +			    void *unused2)
> >  {
> >  	sigset_t old;
> >  	sigset_t all;
> > @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> >  	struct power_supply *psy;
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> > -		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> > -		return;
> > -	}
> 
> Can you explain the purpose of this change please?

I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
try to address).
Lee Jones Oct. 9, 2014, 10:49 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> > > +			    void *unused2)
> > >  {
> > >  	sigset_t old;
> > >  	sigset_t all;
> > > @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> > >  	struct power_supply *psy;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  
> > > -	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> > > -		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> > > -		return;
> > > -	}
> > 
> > Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
> 
> I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
> registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
> above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
> code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
> ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
> try to address).

Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
another patch.
Guenter Roeck Oct. 9, 2014, 1:26 p.m. UTC | #4
On 10/09/2014 03:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
>>>> +			    void *unused2)
>>>>   {
>>>>   	sigset_t old;
>>>>   	sigset_t all;
>>>> @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
>>>>   	struct power_supply *psy;
>>>>   	int ret;
>>>>
>>>> -	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
>>>> -		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
>>>> -		return;
>>>> -	}
>>>
>>> Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
>>
>> I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
>> registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
>> above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
>> code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
>> ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
>> try to address).
>
> Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
> another patch.
>
Sure, no problem. I'll split this into two patches.

Since we are at it, any idea what to do with the restart function
in the same file ? It is not used anywhere.

Guenter
Lee Jones Oct. 9, 2014, 1:33 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 10/09/2014 03:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>>--- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> >>>>+++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> >>>>@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >>>
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> >>>>+static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> >>>>+			    void *unused2)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	sigset_t old;
> >>>>  	sigset_t all;
> >>>>@@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> >>>>  	struct power_supply *psy;
> >>>>  	int ret;
> >>>>
> >>>>-	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> >>>>-		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> >>>>-		return;
> >>>>-	}
> >>>
> >>>Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
> >>
> >>I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
> >>registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
> >>above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
> >>code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
> >>ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
> >>try to address).
> >
> >Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
> >another patch.
> >
> Sure, no problem. I'll split this into two patches.
> 
> Since we are at it, any idea what to do with the restart function
> in the same file ? It is not used anywhere.

You can strip it out with Linus Walleij's Ack.  Or I'll be happy to do
it?
Guenter Roeck Oct. 9, 2014, 3:45 p.m. UTC | #6
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:33:55PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> > On 10/09/2014 03:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >
> > >>On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >>>On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >>>>--- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > >>>>+++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > >>>>@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > >>>
> > >>>[...]
> > >>>
> > >>>>+static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> > >>>>+			    void *unused2)
> > >>>>  {
> > >>>>  	sigset_t old;
> > >>>>  	sigset_t all;
> > >>>>@@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> > >>>>  	struct power_supply *psy;
> > >>>>  	int ret;
> > >>>>
> > >>>>-	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> > >>>>-		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> > >>>>-		return;
> > >>>>-	}
> > >>>
> > >>>Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
> > >>
> > >>I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
> > >>registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
> > >>above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
> > >>code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
> > >>ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
> > >>try to address).
> > >
> > >Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
> > >another patch.
> > >
> > Sure, no problem. I'll split this into two patches.
> > 
> > Since we are at it, any idea what to do with the restart function
> > in the same file ? It is not used anywhere.
> 
> You can strip it out with Linus Walleij's Ack.  Or I'll be happy to do
> it?
> 
I'll strip it out in a 3rd patch.

Guenter
Guenter Roeck Oct. 9, 2014, 3:54 p.m. UTC | #7
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:49:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> > > > +			    void *unused2)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	sigset_t old;
> > > >  	sigset_t all;
> > > > @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> > > >  	struct power_supply *psy;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> > > > -		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> > > > -		return;
> > > > -	}
> > > 
> > > Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
> > 
> > I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
> > registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
> > above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
> > code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
> > ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
> > try to address).
> 
> Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
> another patch.
> 
Turns out the options are to either drop the check or to use the device
managed function to register the poweroff handler. I decided to keep
the check and use the device managed function.

Guenter
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
index 8e0dae5..677438f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ 
 
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
@@ -23,7 +24,8 @@ 
 
 static struct device *sysctrl_dev;
 
-static void ab8500_power_off(void)
+static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
+			    void *unused2)
 {
 	sigset_t old;
 	sigset_t all;
@@ -34,11 +36,6 @@  static void ab8500_power_off(void)
 	struct power_supply *psy;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
-		pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * If we have a charger connected and we're powering off,
 	 * reboot into charge-only mode.
@@ -83,8 +80,15 @@  shutdown:
 					 AB8500_STW4500CTRL1_SWRESET4500N);
 		(void)sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &old, NULL);
 	}
+
+	return NOTIFY_DONE;
 }
 
+static struct notifier_block ab8500_poweroff_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = ab8500_power_off,
+	.priority = 64,
+};
+
 /*
  * Use the AB WD to reset the platform. It will perform a hard
  * reset instead of a soft reset. Write the reset reason to
@@ -185,6 +189,7 @@  static int ab8500_sysctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct ab8500 *ab8500 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 	struct ab8500_platform_data *plat;
 	struct ab8500_sysctrl_platform_data *pdata;
+	int err;
 
 	plat = dev_get_platdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 
@@ -193,8 +198,9 @@  static int ab8500_sysctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	sysctrl_dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	if (!pm_power_off)
-		pm_power_off = ab8500_power_off;
+	err = register_poweroff_handler(&ab8500_poweroff_nb);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register poweroff handler\n");
 
 	pdata = plat->sysctrl;
 	if (pdata) {
@@ -226,11 +232,9 @@  static int ab8500_sysctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static int ab8500_sysctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+	unregister_poweroff_handler(&ab8500_poweroff_nb);
 	sysctrl_dev = NULL;
 
-	if (pm_power_off == ab8500_power_off)
-		pm_power_off = NULL;
-
 	return 0;
 }