diff mbox

[v2,2/4] vfio: spapr: Fix build error

Message ID 1407293313-24894-3-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Alexey Kardashevskiy Aug. 6, 2014, 2:48 a.m. UTC
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The VFIO related components could be built as dynamic modules.
Unfortunately, CONFIG_EEH can't be configured to "m". The patch
fixes the build errors when configuring VFIO related components
as dynamic modules as follows:

  CC [M]  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
In file included from drivers/vfio/vfio.c:33:0:
include/linux/vfio.h:101:43: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’ declared \
inside parameter list [enabled by default]
:
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.maple
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac
  WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr
  MODPOST 1818 modules
ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl" [drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.ko]\
undefined!
ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!

Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[removed include "pci.h" in vfio.c]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
---
Changes:
v2:
* removed #include <linux/pci.h> from vfio.c and tested

---
 drivers/vfio/Makefile         | 4 ++--
 drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Alex Williamson Aug. 6, 2014, 3:12 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:48 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> The VFIO related components could be built as dynamic modules.
> Unfortunately, CONFIG_EEH can't be configured to "m". The patch
> fixes the build errors when configuring VFIO related components
> as dynamic modules as follows:
> 
>   CC [M]  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
> In file included from drivers/vfio/vfio.c:33:0:
> include/linux/vfio.h:101:43: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’ declared \
> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> :
>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries
>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.maple
>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac
>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr
>   MODPOST 1818 modules
> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl" [drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.ko]\
> undefined!
> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
> 
> Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [removed include "pci.h" in vfio.c]
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
> Changes:
> v2:
> * removed #include <linux/pci.h> from vfio.c and tested

I also commented regarding the ifdef around all of vfio_spapr_eeh.c:

        Why not add a new CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH option to handle this
        instead?

Did you disagree?  The ifdef is pretty ugly.

> ---
>  drivers/vfio/Makefile         | 4 ++--
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
> index 50e30bc..4891cca 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1) += vfio_iommu_type1.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += vfio_spapr_eeh.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o \
> +				      vfio_spapr_eeh.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI) += pci/
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
> index f834b4c..1a93e83 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
> @@ -14,15 +14,19 @@
>  #include <asm/eeh.h>
>  
>  /* We might build address mapping here for "fast" path later */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
> +
>  int vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	return eeh_dev_open(pdev);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open);
>  
>  void vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	eeh_dev_release(pdev);
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release);
>  
>  long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
>  				unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> @@ -85,3 +89,5 @@ long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
Gavin Shan Aug. 6, 2014, 3:54 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:12:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:48 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> 
>> The VFIO related components could be built as dynamic modules.
>> Unfortunately, CONFIG_EEH can't be configured to "m". The patch
>> fixes the build errors when configuring VFIO related components
>> as dynamic modules as follows:
>> 
>>   CC [M]  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
>> In file included from drivers/vfio/vfio.c:33:0:
>> include/linux/vfio.h:101:43: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’ declared \
>> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
>> :
>>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries
>>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.maple
>>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac
>>   WRAP    arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr
>>   MODPOST 1818 modules
>> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl" [drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.ko]\
>> undefined!
>> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined!
>> 
>> Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> [removed include "pci.h" in vfio.c]
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>> Changes:
>> v2:
>> * removed #include <linux/pci.h> from vfio.c and tested

Appreciated for Alexey's help on it :)

>
>I also commented regarding the ifdef around all of vfio_spapr_eeh.c:
>
>        Why not add a new CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH option to handle this
>        instead?
>
>Did you disagree?  The ifdef is pretty ugly.
>

I'll introduce CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH.

Thanks,
Gavin

>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/Makefile         | 4 ++--
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 6 ++++++
>>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
>> index 50e30bc..4891cca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1) += vfio_iommu_type1.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += vfio_spapr_eeh.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o \
>> +				      vfio_spapr_eeh.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI) += pci/
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
>> index f834b4c..1a93e83 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
>> @@ -14,15 +14,19 @@
>>  #include <asm/eeh.h>
>>  
>>  /* We might build address mapping here for "fast" path later */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
>> +
>>  int vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	return eeh_dev_open(pdev);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open);
>>  
>>  void vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	eeh_dev_release(pdev);
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release);
>>  
>>  long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
>>  				unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> @@ -85,3 +89,5 @@ long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
>>  
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl);
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
>
>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
index 50e30bc..4891cca 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ 
 obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1) += vfio_iommu_type1.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += vfio_spapr_eeh.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o \
+				      vfio_spapr_eeh.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI) += pci/
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
index f834b4c..1a93e83 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
@@ -14,15 +14,19 @@ 
 #include <asm/eeh.h>
 
 /* We might build address mapping here for "fast" path later */
+#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
+
 int vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	return eeh_dev_open(pdev);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open);
 
 void vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	eeh_dev_release(pdev);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release);
 
 long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
 				unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
@@ -85,3 +89,5 @@  long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
 
 	return ret;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl);
+#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */