Message ID | 1407293313-24894-3-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:48 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > The VFIO related components could be built as dynamic modules. > Unfortunately, CONFIG_EEH can't be configured to "m". The patch > fixes the build errors when configuring VFIO related components > as dynamic modules as follows: > > CC [M] drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o > In file included from drivers/vfio/vfio.c:33:0: > include/linux/vfio.h:101:43: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’ declared \ > inside parameter list [enabled by default] > : > WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries > WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.maple > WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac > WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr > MODPOST 1818 modules > ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl" [drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.ko]\ > undefined! > ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined! > ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined! > > Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > [removed include "pci.h" in vfio.c] > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> > --- > Changes: > v2: > * removed #include <linux/pci.h> from vfio.c and tested I also commented regarding the ifdef around all of vfio_spapr_eeh.c: Why not add a new CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH option to handle this instead? Did you disagree? The ifdef is pretty ugly. > --- > drivers/vfio/Makefile | 4 ++-- > drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile > index 50e30bc..4891cca 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1) += vfio_iommu_type1.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += vfio_spapr_eeh.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o \ > + vfio_spapr_eeh.o > obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI) += pci/ > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c > index f834b4c..1a93e83 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c > @@ -14,15 +14,19 @@ > #include <asm/eeh.h> > > /* We might build address mapping here for "fast" path later */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_EEH > + > int vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > return eeh_dev_open(pdev); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open); > > void vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > eeh_dev_release(pdev); > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release); > > long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group, > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > @@ -85,3 +89,5 @@ long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group, > > return ret; > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl); > +#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 09:12:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: >On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 12:48 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> The VFIO related components could be built as dynamic modules. >> Unfortunately, CONFIG_EEH can't be configured to "m". The patch >> fixes the build errors when configuring VFIO related components >> as dynamic modules as follows: >> >> CC [M] drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o >> In file included from drivers/vfio/vfio.c:33:0: >> include/linux/vfio.h:101:43: warning: ‘struct pci_dev’ declared \ >> inside parameter list [enabled by default] >> : >> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries >> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.maple >> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac >> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.epapr >> MODPOST 1818 modules >> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl" [drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.ko]\ >> undefined! >> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined! >> ERROR: ".vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release" [drivers/vfio/pci/vfio-pci.ko] undefined! >> >> Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> [removed include "pci.h" in vfio.c] >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> >> --- >> Changes: >> v2: >> * removed #include <linux/pci.h> from vfio.c and tested Appreciated for Alexey's help on it :) > >I also commented regarding the ifdef around all of vfio_spapr_eeh.c: > > Why not add a new CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH option to handle this > instead? > >Did you disagree? The ifdef is pretty ugly. > I'll introduce CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH. Thanks, Gavin >> --- >> drivers/vfio/Makefile | 4 ++-- >> drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile >> index 50e30bc..4891cca 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ >> obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1) += vfio_iommu_type1.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += vfio_spapr_eeh.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o \ >> + vfio_spapr_eeh.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI) += pci/ >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c >> index f834b4c..1a93e83 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c >> @@ -14,15 +14,19 @@ >> #include <asm/eeh.h> >> >> /* We might build address mapping here for "fast" path later */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EEH >> + >> int vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> { >> return eeh_dev_open(pdev); >> } >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open); >> >> void vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> { >> eeh_dev_release(pdev); >> } >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release); >> >> long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group, >> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) >> @@ -85,3 +89,5 @@ long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group, >> >> return ret; >> } >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl); >> +#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */ > > >
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile index 50e30bc..4891cca 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile +++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1) += vfio_iommu_type1.o -obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o -obj-$(CONFIG_EEH) += vfio_spapr_eeh.o +obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) += vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.o \ + vfio_spapr_eeh.o obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI) += pci/ diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c index f834b4c..1a93e83 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c @@ -14,15 +14,19 @@ #include <asm/eeh.h> /* We might build address mapping here for "fast" path later */ +#ifdef CONFIG_EEH + int vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return eeh_dev_open(pdev); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open); void vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(struct pci_dev *pdev) { eeh_dev_release(pdev); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release); long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) @@ -85,3 +89,5 @@ long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group, return ret; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl); +#endif /* CONFIG_EEH */