diff mbox

monitor: QEMU Monitor Instruction Disassembly Incorrect for PowerPC LE Mode

Message ID 1396882231-6660-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Tom Musta April 7, 2014, 2:50 p.m. UTC
The monitor support for disassembling instructions does not honor the MSR[LE]
bit for PowerPC processors.

This change enhances the monitor_disas() routine by supporting a flag bit
for Little Endian mode.  Bit 16 is used since that bit was used in the
analagous guest disassembly routine target_disas().

Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>

---

The bug can be easily observed by dumping the first few instructions of an
interrupt vector (0x300 is the Data Storage Interrupt handler in PPC)

  (qemu) xp/8i 0x300
  0x0000000000000300:  .long 0x60
  0x0000000000000304:  lhzu    r18,-19843(r3)
  0x0000000000000308:  .long 0x60
  0x000000000000030c:  lhzu    r18,-20099(r2)
  0x0000000000000310:  lwz     r0,11769(0)
  0x0000000000000314:  lhzu    r23,8317(r2)
  0x0000000000000318:  .long 0x7813427c
  0x000000000000031c:  lbz     r0,19961(0)

With the patch applied, the disassembly now looks correct:

  (qemu) xp/8i 0x300
  0x0000000000000300:  nop
  0x0000000000000304:  mtsprg  2,r13
  0x0000000000000308:  nop
  0x000000000000030c:  mfsprg  r13,1
  0x0000000000000310:  std     r9,128(r13)
  0x0000000000000314:  mfspr   r9,896
  0x0000000000000318:  mr      r2,r2
  0x000000000000031c:  std     r10,136(r13)

 disas.c   |    3 +++
 monitor.c |    3 +++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Maydell April 7, 2014, 3 p.m. UTC | #1
On 7 April 2014 15:50, Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com> wrote:
> The monitor support for disassembling instructions does not honor the MSR[LE]
> bit for PowerPC processors.
>
> This change enhances the monitor_disas() routine by supporting a flag bit
> for Little Endian mode.  Bit 16 is used since that bit was used in the
> analagous guest disassembly routine target_disas().

It seems a touch dubious to assume the area of memory
being dissassembled is necessarily the same endianness
the CPU happens to be currently...

It would be nice to fix the comment at the top of
target_disas() which currently claims something totally
different and wrong for the PPC flags semantics.

> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
>
> ---
>
> The bug can be easily observed by dumping the first few instructions of an
> interrupt vector (0x300 is the Data Storage Interrupt handler in PPC)
>
>   (qemu) xp/8i 0x300
>   0x0000000000000300:  .long 0x60
>   0x0000000000000304:  lhzu    r18,-19843(r3)
>   0x0000000000000308:  .long 0x60
>   0x000000000000030c:  lhzu    r18,-20099(r2)
>   0x0000000000000310:  lwz     r0,11769(0)
>   0x0000000000000314:  lhzu    r23,8317(r2)
>   0x0000000000000318:  .long 0x7813427c
>   0x000000000000031c:  lbz     r0,19961(0)
>
> With the patch applied, the disassembly now looks correct:
>
>   (qemu) xp/8i 0x300
>   0x0000000000000300:  nop
>   0x0000000000000304:  mtsprg  2,r13
>   0x0000000000000308:  nop
>   0x000000000000030c:  mfsprg  r13,1
>   0x0000000000000310:  std     r9,128(r13)
>   0x0000000000000314:  mfspr   r9,896
>   0x0000000000000318:  mr      r2,r2
>   0x000000000000031c:  std     r10,136(r13)
>
>  disas.c   |    3 +++
>  monitor.c |    3 +++
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/disas.c b/disas.c
> index 79e6944..c7804b2 100644
> --- a/disas.c
> +++ b/disas.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,9 @@ void monitor_disas(Monitor *mon, CPUArchState *env,
>  #else
>      s.info.mach = bfd_mach_ppc;
>  #endif
> +    if (flags >> 16) {
> +        s.info.endian = BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE;
> +    }

If you do this then this code will need to change
if you ever add another flag; better to just
test bit 16. (The code in target_disas() for PPC
also gets this wrong.)

Should monitor_disas() support pulling the info.mach
from the flags the way target_disas() does?

thanks
-- PMM
Tom Musta April 7, 2014, 4:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On 4/7/2014 10:00 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> It seems a touch dubious to assume the area of memory
> being dissassembled is necessarily the same endianness
> the CPU happens to be currently...

I don't disagree but it is less dubious than relying on TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN,
which is what the code currently does.

I think the only other alternative is to put it back on the user via options
on the command, e.g.

  xp/8il
  xp/8ib

But, I would contend that the using the MSR[LE] bit would still be a better
default than TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN if an option is not specified.

Thanks for the other comments ... I will incorporate.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/disas.c b/disas.c
index 79e6944..c7804b2 100644
--- a/disas.c
+++ b/disas.c
@@ -489,6 +489,9 @@  void monitor_disas(Monitor *mon, CPUArchState *env,
 #else
     s.info.mach = bfd_mach_ppc;
 #endif
+    if (flags >> 16) {
+        s.info.endian = BFD_ENDIAN_LITTLE;
+    }
     print_insn = print_insn_ppc;
 #elif defined(TARGET_M68K)
     print_insn = print_insn_m68k;
diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 342e83b..5c854fc 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -1309,6 +1309,9 @@  static void memory_dump(Monitor *mon, int count, int format, int wsize,
             }
         }
 #endif
+#ifdef TARGET_PPC
+        flags = msr_le << 16;
+#endif
         monitor_disas(mon, env, addr, count, is_physical, flags);
         return;
     }