Message ID | 1384841915-8264-1-git-send-email-ch.naveen@samsung.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Naveen, On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> wrote: > For Exynos4 and Exynos5 SoCs from Samsung the i2c clock is based > on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and therefore is completely > independent of the cpu frequency. > Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful. > > This patch modifes the code such that, i2c bus registers to > cpu_freq_transition only if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX is enabled. > > This change should save a bunch of cpufreq transitions calls > which does not apply to exynos SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > --- > Changes since v2: > None, Rebased on for-next of linux-i2c git repo. > > Changes since v1: > Use CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX instead of (CONFIG_CPU_FREQ & !CONFIG_EXYNOS) > As commented by Tomasz > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Can you please spin this with comments from <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3235091/>? Thanks! -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Doug, On 26 November 2013 05:11, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > Naveen, > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi > <ch.naveen@samsung.com> wrote: >> For Exynos4 and Exynos5 SoCs from Samsung the i2c clock is based >> on a fixed 66 MHz peripheral clock, and therefore is completely >> independent of the cpu frequency. >> Thus, registering for a CPU freq notifier is very wasteful. >> >> This patch modifes the code such that, i2c bus registers to >> cpu_freq_transition only if CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX is enabled. >> >> This change should save a bunch of cpufreq transitions calls >> which does not apply to exynos SoCs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> >> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> >> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> >> --- >> Changes since v2: >> None, Rebased on for-next of linux-i2c git repo. >> >> Changes since v1: >> Use CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX instead of (CONFIG_CPU_FREQ & !CONFIG_EXYNOS) >> As commented by Tomasz >> >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Can you please spin this with comments from > <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3235091/>? Thanks! Thanks for pointing out for me To summarize, Post f023f8dd59 commit we should be using ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ instead of ARM_S3C24XX_CPUFREQ right. Will re-spin with this changes. > > -Doug > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c index bf8fb94..fa51dff 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-s3c2410.c @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ struct s3c24xx_i2c { struct s3c2410_platform_i2c *pdata; int gpios[2]; struct pinctrl *pctrl; -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX) struct notifier_block freq_transition; #endif }; @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static int s3c24xx_i2c_clockrate(struct s3c24xx_i2c *i2c, unsigned int *got) return 0; } -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_S3C24XX) #define freq_to_i2c(_n) container_of(_n, struct s3c24xx_i2c, freq_transition)