| Message ID | 1381759541-15243-4-git-send-email-phil@zankapfel.net |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
Hi Phil, On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Phil Eichinger <phil.eichinger@gmail.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Phil Eichinger <phil@zankapfel.net> > --- > package/ngrep/ngrep.mk | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk > index 99b8f46..e25d3a2 100644 > --- a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk > +++ b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > NGREP_VERSION = 1.45 > NGREP_SOURCE = ngrep-$(NGREP_VERSION).tar.bz2 > NGREP_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION) > +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style Is it possible to map this onto any of the standard abbreviations as specified here: http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info-list-licenses i.e. BSD-2c, BSD-3c, or BSD-4c ? > +NGREP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt > NGREP_INSTALL_STAGING = YES > NGREP_CONF_ENV = LDFLAGS="-lpcre" > NGREP_CONF_OPT = \ Best regards, Thomas
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> writes: Hi, >> NGREP_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION) >> +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style Thomas> Is it possible to map this onto any of the standard abbreviations as Thomas> specified here: Thomas> http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info-list-licenses Thomas> i.e. BSD-2c, BSD-3c, or BSD-4c ? The closest match is BSD-4c as it contains the dreaded advertising clause, but it isn't a perfect match: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/11/msg00087.html Maybe we should use 'BSD-4c-like'?
On 14 October 2013 21:37, Thomas De Schampheleire < patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Phil Eichinger > <phil.eichinger@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Eichinger <phil@zankapfel.net> > > --- > > package/ngrep/ngrep.mk | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk > > index 99b8f46..e25d3a2 100644 > > --- a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk > > +++ b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk > > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > > NGREP_VERSION = 1.45 > > NGREP_SOURCE = ngrep-$(NGREP_VERSION).tar.bz2 > > NGREP_SITE = > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION) > > +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style > > Is it possible to map this onto any of the standard abbreviations as > specified here: > > http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info-list-licenses > > i.e. BSD-2c, BSD-3c, or BSD-4c ? > I didn't know about the list, thanks! I thought BSD-Style was a valid choice because it's also used for hdparm. Cheers, Phil
Hi, On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote: >>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > >> NGREP_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION) > >> +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style > > Thomas> Is it possible to map this onto any of the standard abbreviations as > Thomas> specified here: > Thomas> http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info-list-licenses > > Thomas> i.e. BSD-2c, BSD-3c, or BSD-4c ? > > The closest match is BSD-4c as it contains the dreaded advertising > clause, but it isn't a perfect match: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/11/msg00087.html > > Maybe we should use 'BSD-4c-like'? That sounds ok to me. Luca?
Hi Thomas, Thomas De Schampheleire: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote: >>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> writes: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> NGREP_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION) >> >> +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style >> >> Thomas> Is it possible to map this onto any of the standard abbreviations as >> Thomas> specified here: >> Thomas> http://buildroot.uclibc.org/downloads/manual/manual.html#legal-info-list-licenses >> >> Thomas> i.e. BSD-2c, BSD-3c, or BSD-4c ? >> >> The closest match is BSD-4c as it contains the dreaded advertising >> clause, but it isn't a perfect match: >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/11/msg00087.html >> >> Maybe we should use 'BSD-4c-like'? > > > That sounds ok to me. To me as well. It clearly expresses it's similar to BSD-4c but not equal.
>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Eichinger <phil.eichinger@gmail.com> writes:
Phil> Signed-off-by: Phil Eichinger <phil@zankapfel.net>
Phil> ---
Phil> package/ngrep/ngrep.mk | 2 ++
Phil> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Phil> diff --git a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk
Phil> index 99b8f46..e25d3a2 100644
Phil> --- a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk
Phil> +++ b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk
Phil> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
Phil> NGREP_VERSION = 1.45
Phil> NGREP_SOURCE = ngrep-$(NGREP_VERSION).tar.bz2
Phil> NGREP_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION)
Phil> +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style
Phil> +NGREP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt
Committed with the license changed to BSD-4c-like, thanks.
diff --git a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk index 99b8f46..e25d3a2 100644 --- a/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk +++ b/package/ngrep/ngrep.mk @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ NGREP_VERSION = 1.45 NGREP_SOURCE = ngrep-$(NGREP_VERSION).tar.bz2 NGREP_SITE = http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/ngrep/ngrep/$(NGREP_VERSION) +NGREP_LICENSE = BSD-Style +NGREP_LICENSE_FILES = LICENSE.txt NGREP_INSTALL_STAGING = YES NGREP_CONF_ENV = LDFLAGS="-lpcre" NGREP_CONF_OPT = \
Signed-off-by: Phil Eichinger <phil@zankapfel.net> --- package/ngrep/ngrep.mk | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)